• Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    After so many years, can’t say I understood the appeal of facial recognition on a phone. You’re already going to be holding it so fingerprint readers still seem superior in every way. You can unlock it before you even take it out of your pocket too.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fingerprint readers require touching a specific spot with a specific digit.

      Face recognition only requires the user be looking at the device.

      The bigger argument is fingerprint readers can be more secure.

      I personally would prefer a device that does both simultaneously for secure requests like accessing credentials.

      • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        So make the reader area bigger and allow people to add all their digits. I think when the iPhone had the home button the reader accepted 10 fingers.

    • Ilandar@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s mostly a combination of a Apple pushing it + people having a singular bad experience with the fingerprint reader on some cheap/old phone and assuming all fingerprint readers are like that.

  • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Finally in the near future we’ll get rid of stupid holes in the screen.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      What near future? Redmagic 10 pro has a very decent underscren camera that you can buy now. Only reason stupid holes in screen exist now is that mainstream phone makers are still assuming all of their customers absolutely care about taking the best selfies all the time.