• Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 天前

    It’s a good idea until you consider the fact that a Raspberry Pi will be astronomically more power efficient.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 天前

      If you think in flops per watt, maybe a little bit, but not a lot. Do you have one or two good procs for almost free, or half a dozen new sbcs at $100 each? Takes a while to save back that amount in power.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 天前

        My question is usually not how many flops, but how quickly and reliably those watts can give me just a few flops on demand.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 天前

    A RPi is going to be smaller, quieter, and 10x more energy efficient though…

    • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 天前

      There are probably a dozen things you can do to save energy on orders of magnitude higher than using a pi.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 天前

        Then do them. It’s still not going to decrease the energy use of your server.

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 天前

            At the HVAC control level it would be a Pico - for the development / maintenance time efficiency: I know how the tools work, I know the community support is there, the hardware is easy to find and available relatively reliably, although ESPHome on the ESP micro-controllers is pretty good too.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 天前

    Power consumption is a massive reason to really not do that. Its cheap for a reason, its takes a shitload of power to be shit and you will pay more in energy than you save in hardware unless its only powered on for short periods of time - a server typically isn’t.

    This is actually something that applies to cheap products too. Was in Asda a little while ago and saw 2 LED bulbs with the same lumen rating. Cheaper one used 3w more and you only saved £1. Running it for 8 hours a day for a year would cost double that saving in electricity. For a server you are looking at almost £2 per watt each year. Does that ewaste look so good to you now?

    Some things are absolutely worth getting second hand, but you really should be careful considering the power cost as well.

    Quick edit: If you don’t need it running 24/7, consider something like AWS too. I love selfhosting but if its not running much it might be cheaper to not bother buying hardware.

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 天前

      This is generally not true. If you are using your laptop as a home server chances are it’s going to be idling 99% of the time and laptops are generally pretty good in terms of idle power draw if you manage to disable the screen (or just disconnect it, take it off and find a way to repurpose it)

      And in terms of environmental impact saving a laptop from landfill is definitely better since the majority of a computers impact is from the co2 emmissions from the manufacturing process. And this isn’t taking into account the likely ethical considerations such as supporting terrible mining practices for resources like cobalt.

      • catty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 天前

        This is generally not true. A small server running on an old pi when idling will have hardly any draw. It will cost literally pennies to run for the whole year.

        • pineapple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 天前

          A rasperry pi idles at about 2 watts vs a laptop that idles at about 4 watts. At $0.30/kwh (a very high price for electricity) you would save 5 dollars per year on electricity. This laptop trades blows with the rasperry pi and costs half the price (55$ aud vs over 200$ aud for a brand new pi 5) Even this second hand one costs 110$ aud which is twice the cost. With that cost of electricity it would take 11 years in order to break even. And that’s only if you consider monetary cost and not environmental cost.

          • catty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 天前

            That’s not the point here. People probably do not need a pi 5. There are many other pi devices (and similar boards) with significantly less draw.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 天前

      Aren’t laptops typically very energy efficient? Low consumption converts to high battery life, which is a priority for laptop hardware.

      Some of them consume less than 10W.

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 天前

      Yes actually still sounds good. Raspberry Pis actually have quite high power draw compared to the performance they give. Like sure the number might be smallish but the performance they give and functionality they have is awful compared to even a mini PC which use similar power. Mini PCs btw are actually one of the best options in performance per watt and can still be cheap, plus they have upgradable RAM and storage. A Mac mini is more expensive but will thrash everything else in efficiency and performance per watt, although non-upgradable. Even slightly older laptops will only draw tens of watts when fully charged, vs a desktop or proper server that could pull 100W even at idle in some cases. Older laptops tended to be more upgradable too.

      • catty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        Please be specific rather than referring to ‘raspberry pis’ together. Different models have way different characteristics.

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 天前

          Are any of them actually that good in efficiency though? Like a Pi 5 is probably the best in performance per watt, but it also has the highest power consumption. Realistically you wouldn’t self host on anything older than a Pi 4 anyway.

          • catty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 天前

            I can self host what I want on a pi zero. But, I do have some 30 years of experience so can probably do things some won’t understand / bother with.

            • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 天前

              Bro please. I understand you can host very small stuff on less powerful Pis. I used to host some stuff on a Raspberry Pi model b myself. Stop tooting your own horn. You couldn’t however host all the stuff I use or even most home labbers use on a Pi zero with modern software. I doubt it could run Jellyfin, an *arr stack, ollama, nextcloud, etc all at the same time. Probably you would also have to drop using containers which would be less secure and easy to deploy.

              What’s the performance per watt of a Pi Zero anyway? I am sure it’s low power draw but I doubt it’s actually efficient.

              • catty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 天前

                See here’s the thing. Why would anyone want to host ALL the stuff on one pi? That is not what they were designed for. Ollama on a pi? Are you out of your mind? I’d run the biggest model I can on a modern gpu not some crappy old computer or pi…Right tool, right job. And why is dropping containers “less secure”? Do you mean “less cool”? Less easy to deploy? But you’re not deploying it, you’re installing it. You sound like a complete newb which is fine, but just take a step back from things and get some more experience. A pi is a tool for a purpose, not the end all. Using an old laptop is not going to save the world and arguing that it’s just better than a pi (or similar alternative) is just dumb. Use a laptop for all I care, I’m not the boss of you.

                As for an arr stack, I’m really disappointed with the software and don’t use it and those who do have way too much time to set it up, and then make use of it!

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 天前

      Are you living on a space station? What is this shitload of power? A whole 60 watts? Are you rationing AA batteries to run your household?

      What is it with the bullshit fanciful rationalizations people come up with to consume consume consume?

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 天前

        And that’s 60W while charging. In idle with the screen off, low end laptops often consume as little as 2-3W. Which is not far off from a pi.

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 天前

          But I want to be cool and awesome! I want to constantly re-learn how to do basic things over and over because TECHNOLOGY!!!

          https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=23718473&cid=65450499

          And I think China is evil and dumb… but I click “add to cart” on aliexpress in my sleep!

          But I am deeply worried about totally renewable energy consumption by buying an endless stream of disposable baubles!

          (Read above in some kind of sarcastic tone)

      • Frater Mus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 天前

        Are you living on a space station? What is this shitload of power?

        Some of us live off-grid and make every Watt-hour we consume. So it may be that one man’s fanciful bullshit is another man’s daily life. For context, this is my 2,461st day offgrid.

        A whole 60 watts?

        Over the last 30 days I’ve averaged 2.01kWh/day, or an average constant consumption of 84w. All in. And that’s on the high end for folks in similar use cases. In this scenario adding in another 60w would be significant (ie, impossible for my rig during winter months).

        As Sesame Street taught showed us it’s a matter of perspective.


        • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 天前

          Um if you’re living with computers are you really „off the grid“ computers require the grid to be manufactured. If you’re off the grid because you worry about the way the worlds going and you think you’ll need to be off the grid to survive I wouldn’t make having access to computers part of the plan.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 天前

        60w is like £120 a year, these costs add up to the point that low spec servers pretty much always cost more in energy than hardware. Of course it also depends on where you live and your energy rates.

        You could buy a 20 year old server that is going to use 800w, or you could buy a mini PC that is probably more powerful and uses like 10-20w.

        Then again, I used to live somewhere that energy was included in the rent so short of starting a bitcoin farm usage wouldn’t really get noticed too much. In that case it would make sense to just go cheap hardware.

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 天前

          I’m glad I don’t have these addictions people seem to have. “I need a computer to measure how much water my toilet uses!” “I need a computer in my refrigerator!” etc

          We’ve passed the useful stage of computing, we are now in the “personal issues” phase.

    • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 天前

      There’s lots of ways to make existing hardware more efficient at the cost of performance. Under-volting the CPU and RAM (or just putting them in “efficiency” mode) can probably save more electricity than you lose in generational improvements. Considering how much more powerful PCs are compared to SBCs, you’d probably still have better performance than an SBC. Also, a more powerful CPU that takes double the power but as a result can idle for more than 50% of the time would be more efficient than a less powerful CPU never idling.

      There’s a lot of other variables (like idle power draw, efficiency at various power levels, idle latency, etc), but in general I think your statement would be inaccurate at least 60% of the time.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        Oh I am not saying specifically get a raspberry pi, personally looking at a bee-link N150 mini PC. It isn’t even that much more expensive than the 16GB raspberry pi and as its x86 I can just run normal debian installs in proxmox.

            • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 天前

              Yes it’s relevant. I have been one of the people making it. However they didn’t specificy what they were actually comparing in their first comment. So it ends up they are saying something false. Your average laptop could easily beat a raspberry pi in performance per watt.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 天前

      A good “rule of thumb” to remember: if your electricity rates average (somewhere near) $0.11/kWh you can take the average power draw of a device in watts and that is equal to what it will cost to run that device 24-7 for 365 days.

      So, if that cheap PC draws 50W more than an alternate solution, it’s costing you $50 more per year to use it.

      Some tasks are beyond any RasPi, but it’s well worth evaluating if something like an N100 fanless mini-PC can handle it instead of loading up some Core i7 rig that’s going to cost more to run in the first year than the N100 costs to buy.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 天前

          Well, the idea scales, if your energy is 0.33 Euro per kWh take the watts x 3 and that’s your annual running cost.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 天前

      Power consumption is a massive reason to really not do that. Its cheap for a reason, its takes a shitload of power to be shit and you will pay more in energy than you save in hardware unless its only powered on for short periods of time

      Ewaste computers actually tend to be on par if not better than an RPi in power consumption these days. It might feel like a RPi should be more efficient given the size and USB power connector, but modern Pis consume a solid 10-20w while in use which is more or similar to most miniPCs (they idle at single digit watts now and can “race to sleep” more effectively than a Pi) while costing about the same and the Pi is far less upgradeable

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 天前

      lowendtalk, hella cheap vps with plenty of resources for most self hosted apps, the issue with it is usually storage space but there are ways around that connecting your drives from elsewhere

      • dil@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        Warning tho, hella shills too but you could literally make a post asking if certain companies on the site that have active threads are scams and get valid responses that don’t get removed or anything so thats nice, like half of the ones I looked at were giving less resources than they claimed

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 天前

    Also, Raspberry Pi first got popular because of the size and cost. Now it’s popular because it’s popular. Not hating on them, I think they’re cool, but they’re not cheap any more. Especially with the scalping.

    Getting x86_64 based systems is going to mean much less headache. Unless you truly truly need the size I wouldn’t consider getting a Pi or other SBC. Just go to literally any used marketplace (Facebook, Craigslist, etc) and get anything.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 天前

      but they’re not cheap any more

      People say this, but they really are still cheap.

      The original Raspberry Pi Model B launched for £22 in 2012. The entry level Raspberry Pi 5 is £46, but adjusted for inflation that’s only £32 in 2012 money. So only £10 more expensive in real terms.

      Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is only £14.40, which is only £10 in 2012 money. Compare this to the original Raspberry Pi Model A, which launched for £16.

      People look at the headline cost of the high end RPi 5s (£115 for the 16GB model, £76 for the 8GB), but fail to recognise that there was nothing comparable to these in the Raspberry Pi lineup before, and these are not the only models in the Raspberry Pi lineup now.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 天前

        There was the supply shortage price spike, they really were stupid expensive then if you supported the hoarder/scalpers.

        Since that has cleared… most of the Pi price increases (in inflation adjusted dollars) can be attributed to improved features like more RAM, or people acknowledging that having a good dedicated $20 power supply is preferable to dealing with the flakiness of that old phone charger you found under the bed.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 天前

          Don’t like the expensive version? Get a Zero 2 W which outspecs the original by a wide margin.

        • Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 天前

          Sure, but the specs aren’t directly comparable.

          They also still manufacture the RPi 4, which starts at £33- which is £23 in 2012 money.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 天前

        Inflation adjustment doesn’t really tell the whole story though, it’s not like salaries have gone up by the same amount. Regardless, I don’t like dealing with the Zero unless I specifically need something that tiny. It’s just too annoying. Don’t get me wrong! They’re cool! I’m just saying unless I really need a Pi Zero I wouldn’t wanna work with one. I’d rather work with x86_64 than Arm. Like even just getting Java working was really tricky on Zero. Much like a microcontroller has limitations for what you can run on them but they have other benefits, Zeros aren’t really general purpose.

        So yeah, dirt cheap used laptop for general purpose server beats out dirt cheap Pi in my book.

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 天前

      That’s only true for the high-end Pi 5. Lower-powered models like the zero 2 are still cheap, and they’re a lot easier to find than a few years ago.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 天前

      Pi is popular with me because it’s time efficient. Meaning: when I am trying to get it to do something, it takes less of my time to make the thing actually happen on Pi hardware as compared with most of the other small / embedded alternatives. Notable recent exception: ESPHome on ESP32 hardware, but even there the more limited variation of Raspberry hardware makes it similar to those fruity phones, MP3 players and computers - since there are a limited number of variations, you can usually find information specific to EXACTLY your setup, instead of having to infer from something almost the same, but figure out little wrinkles here and there due to differences between what you are working with and what you are reading about on the internet.

    • czardestructo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 天前

      No gpio but old centrino laptops make excellent low power servers. My primary server was a first gen centrino from 2011 up until recently and I think it only used 12w idle after putting a SSD in there. Had it’s own UPS built in.

      • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 天前

        What kind of place do you go to to find these things? Sometimes I get really lucky (see my post history about my wonderful new printer), but if I could increase my odds that would be cool.

        • stray@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 天前

          I’m just lucky enough to have one at my apartment building, and very wasteful neighbors.

          • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 天前

            Back when I lived in a (quite nice) apartment building I was constantly surprised at the things people threw out. Perfectly good furniture but also stuff like perfectly functional printers, artwork, computer cases…

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 天前

              If you go near college housing there’s usually a given day of the year (either moving day or an official cleanup day) when tons of people put out stuff they don’t want to bother with keeping/moving. It’s Hippie Christmas baby!

        • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 天前

          Worth noting pie 4 and 5 no longer recommend 5w PSU. And tend to fail if anything is drawing on the USB.

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 天前

          I think 5W probably can’t be achieved, maybe with chromebook-like hardware, but I guess GPIO could be solved with a USB accessory

          in my opinion the bigger problem is the fire hazard of an unsupervised charger. I have seen enough that runs super hot, and even if it doesn’t, I just can’t trust them.

        • stray@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 天前

          I’m in an apartment building, so I just browse the one here whenever I take the trash out. I don’t think anyone has noticed, or they’ve elected to mind their own business if they have.

          There’s so much stuff that could still be used that it honestly isn’t funny, and that’s just in my own bin. How much more is being wasted across the country? But at least it’s in the recycling and not the trash, so that’s something, I guess.

    • martinb@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 天前

      There are usb gpio devices which can fulfill the connectivity bit. Pretty sure you are sol with the 5w though 😊

      • elmicha@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 天前

        The Raspberry Pi Zero in USB gadget mode can be used for GPIO. If you don’t want to setup gadget mode, get Pi Zero W.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        About to be? The bottom has been falling out for desktops and laptops on processors not on Microsoft’s supported list for the last year or more. I’ve seen roughly the same system go from ~$200+ down to under $100 on the last year based on eBay pricing alone

  • Hyacin (He/Him)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    7 天前

    I mostly agree, and did the same with my second gen lab build - instead of shiny new NUCs like I had used round 1, I bought old off lease Dell Xeon boxes. SO MANY PROS -

    • Got them up to 14c/28t each
    • They can take GPUs and actually do heavy transcoding/ML work
    • They can take up to like, 128GB of memory, which is GREAT when they’re all hypervisors

    The downsides can’t be denied though -

    • Even without the GPUs and beefed up CPUs, they are power hogs - the CPU alone uses more than an ENTIRE NUC
    • They run HOT
    • They run LOUD

    The same holds true for off-lease SFF stuff, Lenovo and the likes …

    So while reuse/repurpose is absolutely of the utmost importance, no question - when it comes to technology and how quickly it advances and miniaturizes, a thorough and logical pros/cons list is often required.

    I’d add another option though - if you do need what a Pi brings to the table - do you really need a shiny new Pi 5? Is it possible a used Pi 3 or Pi 4 would do the trick, and check the reuse box?

    • AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 天前

      The power aspect is a lot bigger of a factor than I would have thought. I had an old computer I was going to use as a server for Foundry that I could keep up all the time, but when I measured its wattage and did the math, it would cost me $20 a month to keep on. A pi costs like $2 to keep running, so it paid for itself pretty quick

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 天前

      RPis aren’t energy efficient either. Any situation where you are thinking of putting more than one of them in a cluster you should just buy mini PCs instead.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 天前

    Only if you’re running it at full load all the time and comparing that to a comparable number of raspberry pis it would take to do the same amount of work. Also, only if you live in a cold climate and the heat generated is not a concern and power is supplied by a renewable source so power isn’t a concern.

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 天前

    And for some (including me) that’s our only computer (other than phone). I just can’t afford anything, so all I have is a shitty laptop from 2010 that barely plays 1080p video. I deeply want something better, especially a steam deck, but doesn’t look like that’ll happen anytime soon (or ever). And then you see people have steam decks that just sit there, unused, gathering dust… fuck.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 天前

      Consider buying used hardware from an office. Lots of places sell used gear for dirt cheap. A used office desktop with a used GPU from the last 3 years or so would be a massive upgrade without spending much.

      Steam Deck is still a good deal for what it is though, but I wouldn’t use it as a primary workstation.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 天前

      Honestly, if you’re in the States I have a bunch of HP ProDesks that my wife would be very happy to see disappear from our basement (I bid on an auction I didn’t expect to win lol). I’d happily send one for the cost of shipping

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 天前

    Yeah… I’m not going to stick a clunky old laptop on top of my bookshelf and have it run 24/7 as my PiHole. My Pi Zero 2 W is far more appropriate.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 天前

        I mean, a lot of things would work, I could power it all with potato batteries if I had enough. The Pi Zero 2 W only cost ~£15 anyway.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 天前

      I agree that the Zero is up to the task, but I prefer a wired connection for my home DNS/DHCP server and if I understand correctly the Pi5 has better wired ethernet than its predecessors… Yeah, utilization is laughable, but there’s something to be said for reduced lag time too:

      Hostname:	pihole
      CPU:	0.2% on 4 cores running 318 processes (0.3% used by FTL)
      RAM:	25.9% of 2.0 GB is used (7.4% used by FTL)
      Swap:	35.9% of 512.0 MB is used
      Kernel:	Linux pihole 6.12.25+rpt-rpi-2712 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 1:6.12.25-1+rpt1 (2025-04-30) aarch64
      Uptime:	a month (running since Sunday, May 18th 2025, 17:54:59
      
      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 天前

        I have never felt the need to have a wired connection for my DNS/DHCP, since such a trivial amount of data exchanges hands. The quality of the wired connection if it had one would similarly have negligible impact, surely.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 天前

          For me it’s not about the bandwidth, it’s about the lag and reliability. I have had strong WiFi connections flake out a lot more than wired connections.

          Also, I just prefer to not have 100+ WiFi devices kicking around my network when more than half of them could be wired, or on another protocol like Zigbee.

          • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            I guess I am pretty far from saturating my WiFi in any way, the removal of cables with little to no impact on connectivity was far more of a priority for me. I have never noticed a WiFi related outage or performance loss.

            • MangoCats@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 天前

              I will say this: we had a big lightning strike a few years back and it conducted into the house via the internet cable, then spread via the ethernet cables taking out everything that was wired (over $7K in damage) - devices connected only by power and WiFi were mostly spared.

            • MangoCats@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 天前

              My WiFi routers have historically struggled a bit, I’ve got a decent one now, but even it is slow to manage the DHCP lists for fixed assignments by MAC address.

  • chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 天前

    Its all fun and games until the power bill arrives. Performance per watt is important, please look at that first. Don’t be me.

    • This is, in my mind, one of the benefits of laptops over micro computers: integrated UPS. Even an old, degraded battery will probably get you a couple of hours with the screen off.

      IME, power consumption is going to be worse overall, for any laptop likely to be in the recycle bin, it’s probably double the consumption of an ARM SBC. The integrated UPS and usually decent power conditioning of the power supply saves you more money with a laptop. Plus, keyboard and screen for emergencies - I just generally expect that, over there life of a micro I’m going to have to drag out and plug in a spare keyboard, mouse, and monitor because something in a device, or an upgrade, or BIOS flash, is preventing a boot.

      There are a lot of good reasons to use laptops instead of SBCs, if you don’t mind the extra power draw and (as she says) don’t have size requirements.

        • No, I didn’t. I don’t use Pis, I have ODroids. Heck, they may sell batteries for ODroids, too.

          For me, it wouldn’t have made much difference because I have UPSes around the house serving things like routers, modems, and switches. And I do care about size and energy use. I’m only saying there are advantages to using laptops.

          You can get little integrated LCD cases for Pis too, can’t you? And maybe even a little fold-out keyboard. Congratulations! You’ve re-invented the laptop!

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 天前

      Replacement is usually removing 6-10 screws and prying the case with a guitar pick or old credit card. There is most likely a disassembly video on youtube. Batteries from aliexpress or the like are usually cheap (although probably more expensive than the computer). Depending on the application, the “built-in UPS” can be nice.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 天前

          I do SMB support, so I have a pretty good idea of what people tend to do.

          I haven’t seen a PS brick catch fire (possible, OFC, but extremely rare in my opinion) i have seen a PC PSU catch fire, and because of the fan, it’s fucking scsry, like a jet with the afterburner.

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 天前

          Laptop chargers are no fire hazards anymore than raspberry pi PSUs are. In fact probably the RPi parts are worse as they are built down to a cost.

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            I would assume that landfill laptop manufacturers are trying to minimize costs even harder on the charger.

            but what timeframe do you mean with “anymore”? laptops made in this decade, or the last 10 years, or something else? there’s plenty of old laptops that fitinto OPs category.

            • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 天前

              Probably for as long as raspberry pis have been around. There have been plenty of scares with phone chargers exploding, and that’s what a raspberry pi is powered from. Laptop chargers haven’t had many issues in the past decade or so.

              • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 天前

                I have heard less about phone chargers failing catastrophically. They also handle much less power (except the fancy ones), and I haven’t seen a hot phone charger adapter yet, but plenty laptop chargers of which some were just very warm, and some so hot just on its outsides that it was uncomfortable to hold it in hand.

                this is why I’m more worried about laptop chargers

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 天前

      These things are removable with a screwdriver in most cases. If the battery isn’t completely dead it’s actually useful for backup power.

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 天前

        I had read about it on another thread, which was about using old smartphones as servers (they used Termux).

        Those old lithium batteries, although sometimes seemingly healthy, can catch fire any time. Having them connected to the charger 24/7 is only making matters worse.

        I wouldn’t trust the battery of old devices. I would probably buy a used UPS (without battery) and slap a new battery to it. This would cost more, but it would allow me to also connect other important devices to it - like the router and some lights.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 天前

      Not simple to remove. They can all be taken out.

      But the fire risk is a very valid point. All laptops should indicate they should not be left alone when charging. While many do. Setting one up in a unobserved location to run permanently should be batteryless or Lifepo4 adapted. So laptops may not be best suited to this environment. A used thin client or other DC input option may be much easier. Or an old desktop if batts and not wanted.