A year ago I built a NAS to reduce my reliance on cloud services, and set up an arr stack. I went with TrueNAS Scale, which was on Bluefin at the time. In the past 12 months, TrueNAS Scale has been through FOUR major OS versions, with a fifth already announced. At least one of those involved a release train switch so, despite diligently checking for updates in the dashboard, I was left in the dust with an obsolete OS, and didn’t find out until it was already a huge hassle to upgrade.

I’ve been really happy with the utility and benefit of having this tool, but holy smokes how is anybody supposed to keep up with all of this? This is far from my only hobby, and I simply do not have the time, patience, or interest for a constant race to keep up with vetting new release versions and fixing what breaks every 3 weeks. I have enough tinkering hobbies as it is.

On top of that, there’s the whole blow up with TrueCharts, which has also left me with an entire suite of obsolete albatrosses around my NAS that I need to deal with. Am I still waiting for them to figure out an upgrade path? I don’t even know anymore.

Sorry for the rant, but I guess what I’m looking for is: how do you keep up with the constant maintenance and updates, and where do I go from here, in February 2025, with a system running Bluefin 22.12, a 32TB ZFS pool (RAIDZ1) that has to remain intact, and a handful of TrueCharts apps that I don’t want to lose the data from (e.g. Jellyfin configs/watch history)?

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    You might want to think about running a “stable” or “LTS” OS and spin up things in Docker instead. That way you only have to do OS level updates very rarely.

    • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      I learned this the hard way as well… I did a big OS update on mine once and it broke almost every application running on it. Docker worked perfectly still. I transferred everything I could to Docker after that.

  • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I have everything containerized (Podman) on my Debian PC and use Diun to check for updates and send notifications to a Discord server that I monitor. I do all of my updates manually so I don’t update unless I have time to troubleshoot; if it breaks I still have the configs and data so I can delete the container and start over.

    I also do monthly backups to cold storage (yeah, they should be weekly/biweekly but it’s just personal data that I’m okay with losing). I don’t use a RAID config or BTFS/ZFS like some do, so it’s pretty easy to just set it and forget it. It really depends on what you’re trying to do, how bulletproof it needs to be, and how you like to organize things.

  • Azzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I’ve got backups. Haven’t updated or looked at my server in months. If I’m ever compromised by missing security updates, I just load a backup and regenerate all keys.

    I don’t put any critical data on public facing servers.

  • 31337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If it works, I don’t update unless I’m bored or something. I also spread things out on multiple machines, so there’s less chance of stuff happening like you describe with the charts feature going away. My NAS is pretty much just a NAS now.

    You can probably backup your configs/data, upgrade, then deploy jellyfin again, restore, and reconfigure. You should probably backup your data on your ZFS pool. But, I recently updated to the latest TrueNas Scale from ~5 year old FreeBSD version of TrueNas and the pools still worked fine (none of the “apps” or jails worked, obviously). The upgrade process even ported my service configurations over. I didn’t care about much of the data in the pools, so only backed up the most important stuff.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    OS updates I only bother with every 6-12mo, though I also use debian which doesn’t push major updates all that regularly.

    As far as software goes; pretty much everything is in a docker container with watchtower automatically pulling new updates to those nightly at 4am. It sends me email notifications, so It’ll tell me if an update fails; combined with uptime-kuma notifying me if any of my services is unavailable for whatever reason.

    The rest I’ll usually do with the OS updates. Just because an update was released, doesn’t mean you’ve gotta drop everything and install it right this moment.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Use Debian LTS or Ubuntu LTS (10 years support with free Ubuntu Pro). Turn on automatic unattended updates. Upgrade OS when you’re bored one of those years.

    Keywords:

    • Debian
    • Ubuntu
    • LTS
    • ZFS
    • Docker (compose)
  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    In the business world it’s pretty common to do staged or switchover upgrades: test new version in a lab environment, iron out the install/config details. Then upgrade a single production server and do a test with a small group of users. Or, build new servers with the new stuff, have a set of users run on it for a while, in this way you can always just move those users back to a known good server.

    How do you do this at home? VMs for lots of stuff, or duplicate hardware for NAS type stuff (I’ve read of running TrueNAS in a VM).

    To borrow from the preparedness community: if you have 1 you have none, if you have 2 you have 1. As an example, the business world often runs mission-critical systems in a redundant setup in regionally-different data centers, so a storm won’t take them down. The question is how to reproduce this idea in a home lab environment.

    • skilltheamps@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      This is not practical for a home setup. Not because it would be expensive for more hardware or whatever, but because as soon as you have multiple systems doing the same thing, their state diverges and for pretty much anything that is popular for selfhosting you cannot merge them again or mirgrate users between them without loosing anything. Distributed databases alone are a huge pita, and maintaining such redundant setups would be a million times more effort than just making sure that you can easily and quickly atomically roll back failed updates

  • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I have rss feeds for my main service updates so I know what new features I have, the services mostly run in podman containers and update automatically each Monday. I also have daily backups (timed to run just before the update on monday) in case anything does break.

    If it breaks I fix it depending on how much I want/need it, mostly it’s a matter of half an hour to fix it and with my current NixOS/Podman system I haven’t yet needed to fix anything this year so it breaks infrequently.

    Also why are you using Kubernetes on a single host if you want minimal maintenance? XD

    My recommendation is to switch to just managing containers, you should just be able to export the volumes out of kubernetes and import them as normal volumes, as long as they’re mounted in the right place you keep your data and if it doesn’t work just try again. Not like you need to destroy the current system to slowly replace it.

    Edit: I also recommend to update and reboot frequently, this stops updates and unstable configurations from piling up.

  • Matt The Horwood@lemmy.horwood.cloud
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    First off, backups of the configs any user data that you can’t torrent should the inevitable happen.

    Then set time aside to do updates, I spend Wednesday evenings updating and improving my setup.

    Then find a way to track update announcements, I use both an RSS reader and newrealeases.io to know when something I run gets an update

  • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    For one I don’t use software that updates constantly. If I had to log in to a container more than once a year to fix something, I’d figure out something else. My NAS is just harddrives on a Debian machine.

    Everything I use runs either Debian or is some form of BSD

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I dont :) Mostly.

    Honestly I have an auto backup system. And then set it up to auto update periodically. Then use Debian Server as it almost never breaks as a server distro.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Is it exposed to the internet?

    Mine is local only so I’m not as diligent with updates. I push them like once every 2-3 weeks. Some containers automatically update but some don’t because in the past that has broken associated scripts

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have automatic updates on everything. If it breaks, I fix it when I have time. If I don’t, it remains broken.

    I could also just not do updates, but I like new features.