Click a link and need to go back 10x to get back. Yes, I enjoy the footballs.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s not for this, of course. It’s because in the world of single page applications built in react and angular where there is no physical back, like no actual server page to go back to just JavaScript, you have to code in what the back button means. Even though there’s no server calls to ask for a new page. New page. Most people still expect that forward and back will still go forward and back in standard navigation.

      Sites like this it’s pretty clear that they just overwrite that with the last 20 calls to their own page, but the alternative is that single page applications would not be able to have forward or back functionality

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          8 days ago

          Great I’ll just add a unique guid to each path that is ignored and returns to the same place. You show me a 10 foot fence I’ll show you an 11 foot ladder.

          • hddsx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I mean, I get that. I was making a joke. But 12 ft fence? Load in sandbox and compare html. Your move.

              • hddsx@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                14 ft fence: Diff in html. If less than 10 lines different, ban.

                • PoolloverNathan@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  15 ft ladder:

                  <div hidden>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  <?= rand() ?>
                  </div>
                  
    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s a very “dumb” implementation of a generally useful feature. Browsers don’t keep track of how many times you’re redirected to the same site or try to consolidate the back-button list accordingly, but they certainly could. Wouldn’t be surprised if there was a plugin to this effect.

      • groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 days ago

        They actually do. To avoid infinite loops. If a URL redirects to the identical URL for more than ~5 times most browsers will refuse to load and show an error instead.

        That’s why sites like this will generate new URLs with the same content.