• RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Meta also allegedly modified settings “so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur,”

    Big tech taking without giving back to the community once again.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think this is still going to be a net benefit to us, though. Meta may not have contributed much bandwidth, which is leeching in the short term, but in the long term they’re now forced to contribute something much more important; lawyer power. Meta is going to have to fight to defend piracy.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          You think Meta will just roll over and hand out whatever penalties the publishers demand of them?

          Meta isn’t going to be defending us. It’s going to be defending itself. Because it is now one of us.

          • brisk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Secret out-of-court settlement is an option.

            Also known as “bribing your way out of the law”

  • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Aaron Swartz does it for educational journals and gets the hammer brought down on him. Zuck n’ Co do it and get government funding.

    Boo.

  • verdigris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Motherfuckers are actually arguing that seeding a torrent isn’t “distributing” unless they can show an instance of someone downloading a book from their IP… If that flies they better overturn every fucking piracy conviction ever.