They’re looking for a sustainable revenue stream because the Google subsidy is bound to dry up.
if they manage to make it an actual good product and also not host it in the US, they might even be able to pull it off
Just be Proton without the support for fascism. Easy.
isnt the proton ceo praising trump publicly?
Congratulated him on day 1, I don’t think said anything since
which means its ok for you. I cant follow
fascism
Huh? What did I miss
Until the lawsuit between Steve Teixeira and Mozilla reveals the truth, I’m going to withhold my judgment about how fascistic Mozilla was internally.
Teixeira claimed Mozilla conducted an audit that found them pretty lacking in the equality department IIRC, and Mozilla’s own lawyers disputed many things but not that.
I’d need to be able to choose a non-US server too. And even then, all the major tech firms breached EU laws by later transferring data back to the US. But if I had to trust an American company Mozilla would be among the better choices.
They are thinking of having the user choose the juridiction. So far their testing is hosted in the EU apparently.
Isn’t Mozilla a US company?
Somehow I don’t see them leaving the place where they do business
Thunderbird and Firefox are developed by separate companies (both under the Mozilla Foundation). Thunderbird is funded through donations. Firefox is funded through (among other sources, such as Pocket and advertisements) the Google search deal. As far as I know it’s not legally feasible (or even possible) for the Firefox money to go to Thunderbird or vice versa.
Article says revenue from this won’t fund firefox.
They make a significant cut of their money through their portfolio
Thunderbird is funded by donations and operates under the MZLA banner.
These articles today are doing a disservice to the Thunderbird team who work independently of Mozilla afaik.
Few know how things are structured. Or more importantly, how it could be restructured later.
These articles purport to be written by journalists though. Fact checking is meant to be a staple of the job description.
Just for argument’s sake, it’s easier to change the behavior of one mismanaged foundation than the broken news cycles
Thunderbird is not a Mozilla project. It is independent of Mozilla including it’s financing and has been for several years now.
My understanding is MZLA was set up so Thunderbird could accept donations and manage it’s own finances independently of Mozilla. There have been no allegations anywhere that MZLA has been mismanaged.
few people know that or will understand it; it’s been tarnished by the foundation.
If I were managing thunderbird, I would do a rebrand because I am not the first or last person to make that mistake ; there are tens of millions of me
The journalists who published these articles had an opportunity to educate their readers by not spreading misinformation and by not misrepresenting Thunderbird’s relationship to Mozilla.
The issue here isn’t the disdain anyone has for Mozilla (although that might be yours). The issue is the misrepresentation of Thunderbird as a Mozilla project by news media.
I am influenced by both and control none, bobbing along the waves of misinformation and mismanagement like a cork in the ocean .
Independently of the Mozilla team, yes.
However, my understanding is that, if Thunderbird were to become
hugelyprofitable, the Mozilla Foundation would benefit financially, though indirectly.The organizational structure:
- Mozilla Foundation = parent organization
- MZLA Technologies Corporation (which owns Thunderbird) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation
- Mozilla Corporation (which produces Firefox) is also a subsidiary of the Foundation
When Thunderbird moved to MZLA Technologies Corporation in January 2020, this was specifically done to allow Thunderbird to “collect revenue through partnerships and non-charitable donations”.
As a wholly owned subsidiary, any profits generated by MZLA would ultimately flow back to its parent organization, the Mozilla Foundation.
In the end, that revenue would probably go to all the smart investments we’ve seen the Mozilla Foundation make over the previous years. 🙄
You’re right, but I think “hugely profitable” is probably optimistic - I’d expect something to the level of Proton or Fastmail. Fine, but not a big money maker like Firefox is.
Sure, applies to getting to any level of profitability.
As written in the article
Moz doesn’t contribute financially to Thunderbird’s development, according to Sipes, and whatever revenue the Thunderbird team generates will go straight into furthering its work.
Thunderbird really needs to be a totally separate thing
Mozilla is the new Google at this point. Google set the bar in hell so everyone else can get away with a lot.
Ah yes the move from software developer to service provider. Smells like en(shit)tification.
Lets hope they do this right unlike everyone else.
Smells like en(shit)tification.
What are the parenthesis here for? Without it would be “smells like entification”??
Smells like shit…
Smells like (en)shit(tification) looks kinda shit.
Smells like en**shit**tification
I’m cynical and already looking at forks
Good for you, but those forks too owe their existence (among other things) to the donations (and down the road subscriptions) to Thunderbird.
¿forks of email and calendar services?
Swapped to waterfox a while ago. Copied the profile folder over and boom, done, no more mozilla corp in my browser.
That’s a Firefox fork, not a thunderbird fork.
Figured this was talking about ditching Mozilla altogether, as this news is about a web service, not a new anti-feature in Thunderbird.
I really hope this doesn’t impact the client too significantly. A substantial part of why I use Thunderbird is to keep out of these “ecosystems”.
I’m sure Mozilla will run a heathy and sustainable project straight into the ground.
That’s what they do
Mozilla doesn’t run Thunderbird
Well… The Mozilla Corporation doesn’t. But both the Corporation and MZLA (which makes Thunderbird) are owned by the Mozilla Foundation.
But yeah, the different org does probably matter.
Not yet
I think the purpose is to find a source of revenue so that they don’t have to ruin their product. There’s a lot of potential good here, in addition to the unfortunately undeniable potential bad.
when they said they would look for a way to monetize firefox i was worried, but this is actually great if they make a good service.
They are really not selling me with their recent antics
I agree. I would love to see a competitor to gmail/office365 that respects privacy
Mozilla: “what is this you speak of”
If there’s one thing I’m sure of, the font and buttons will be 10 sizes too big and not configurable.
Always felt like this needed to happen for long time now. I guess now better than never. Got to figure out a business model. Reselling Mullvad as Firefox VPN was a start. I feel like everything that Proton does, Firefox should be doing but with a Linux file manager application
Sounds like good news. I just hope they won’t put some bullshit in the TOS saying they can scan your emails to train their AI.
Would be great if they create a real competition to proton mail
This is great news!
People should check out thunderbird appointments if they haven’t.
Uh oh. The reason gmail is profitable is because they see all your emails and sell your profile to others.
I dont want Mozilla doing that.
In the article it says they will have no ads and no data mining. The user will pay for the service.
I hope they’re going to keep the late 90s theme from Thunderbird. Maybe a dancing baby gif.
Have you used Thunderbird lately?
What do you consider 90’s?
I use Thunderbird and it is anything but 90’s
pls no.
Oh, bother.
deleted by creator
1998 called…
and praised us for finally moving away from gmail, with a superior email client.
Called what?
