They don’t have a problem with what is being done, just who are the ones doing it.

The reminds me of what Zizek said of the liberals: they are very cynical. “We need to do things we don’t believe are good, maybe even bad, but it works”

It’s in the best interest of the DNC to adopt policies and campaign approaches that have the best chance of winning.

The donors and the consultants making the bulk of the decisions disagree. The donors are motivated to shape policy, not win elections. The consultants are motivated to raise money, not win elections. They literally tell us they would rather loose than be disloyal to Biden by criticizing his legacy.

Did the Dems gain significant votes by offering Liz Cheney a seat at the table?

Having a big tent isn’t winning the election. They need to be offering seats at the table.

History starts when I say it does

Misses says my T-shirt tan ruins the look, not the dad bod ❤️

Which one is for bringing the genocide home?

I don’t think having a diversity in viewpoints on whether kids have rights is something to celebrate.

It’s all about individual freedom until you start asking libertarians about the rights of kids and contractual indentured servitude.

Jared Kushner: Let’s make the west bank into a resort

Buy a supreme Court justice with the first 100M, then the rest of the court with the other Billion.

Genie comes from a time when offering any monetary loan is considered usury, doesn’t care about your governments made of mortals.

Huh, I guess you can do just about anything if you’re willing to pay the political cost.

Those suggesting other candidates should probably address the three issues AOC brought up:

• Endorsements doesn’t transfer
• Campaign contributions doesn’t transfer
• Possible state level shenanigans by GOP to keep candidates chosen after some technicality off ballot

None of these issues exist if Biden simply steps down.

Money paw finger curls in

Don’t worry, Nancy wants Newsom to be the candidate.

o7

IDK, it could be like with priests, where the job attracts a certain type because of the perks…

I have found that the results from Baidu do not state whether violence happened or how many were killed in regards to the massacre. The event also seems absent from the Baidu encyclopedia: https://baike.baidu.com/item/天安门/63708

This is more than a government that doesn’t want to acknowledge any violence on their part, it acts to silence discussion around the event and the .ml community’s actions replicate that effect (which damns any objectivity the mods have).

Well now that we have established that it is as censored as I believe because I have first hand experience, can we circle back to massacres and censoring said massacres are bad and not what we want in a social media service?