Misses says my T-shirt tan ruins the look, not the dad bod ❤️
Which one is for bringing the genocide home?
I don’t think having a diversity in viewpoints on whether kids have rights is something to celebrate.
It’s all about individual freedom until you start asking libertarians about the rights of kids and contractual indentured servitude.
Jared Kushner: Let’s make the west bank into a resort
Buy a supreme Court justice with the first 100M, then the rest of the court with the other Billion.
Genie comes from a time when offering any monetary loan is considered usury, doesn’t care about your governments made of mortals.
Huh, I guess you can do just about anything if you’re willing to pay the political cost.
Those suggesting other candidates should probably address the three issues AOC brought up:
None of these issues exist if Biden simply steps down.
Money paw finger curls in
Don’t worry, Nancy wants Newsom to be the candidate.
IDK, it could be like with priests, where the job attracts a certain type because of the perks…
I have found that the results from Baidu do not state whether violence happened or how many were killed in regards to the massacre. The event also seems absent from the Baidu encyclopedia: https://baike.baidu.com/item/天安门/63708
This is more than a government that doesn’t want to acknowledge any violence on their part, it acts to silence discussion around the event and the .ml community’s actions replicate that effect (which damns any objectivity the mods have).
Well now that we have established that it is as censored as I believe because I have first hand experience, can we circle back to massacres and censoring said massacres are bad and not what we want in a social media service?
Dude, I literally ran a Firefox plugin at one time that gave me the “Great Firewall of China” experience. But just in case, I went over to Baidu and did a search and here’s the official story you speak of (and the only one told in the search results): https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2011-07/14/content_12898720.htm
The article does not address how many people were killed or even whether violence occurred.
I would call those results to be censorship.
Edit: I don’t like the South Korean state either, but not more or less, just different. I’m not here to say which state is more morally justified than another, even when they’re at end stage capitalism.
If the discussion is about how a government that massacres its own people and censors even searches of it is bad, then no, rectifying that difference in number doesn’t make the objection go away.
Deleting and banning those who discuss tienamen square is pretty damning IMHO.
Come on dude, I just mentioned Blahaj. Don’t pretend only .world has a problem with .ml . And again, the two complaints of censorship raised by the two are not the same. The majority of communities wants moderation to at least attempt to be objective towards history.
And? I was over at Blahaj when this stuff went down so admittedly things played differently in different parts of the fediverse. Even so, the details of how things escalated should not distract from the behavior that is central to the conflict: ML engaging in censorship motivated by personal ideology instead of making an attempt to be objective.