![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/19653cb5-54d5-4074-94a5-48ce7f2a0d6d.webp)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ca9b0de3-205f-47ca-a620-5fbddb680695.png)
It’s this kind of nonsense that always makes me run back to my iPhone.
It’s this kind of nonsense that always makes me run back to my iPhone.
Until you realize that their implementation of AI, whatever that means, in their case is mediocre, and nothing more than a marketing term. 
As with everything Samsung tends to do I’ll bet the AI stuff is half baked. 
I had a light camera. It was very good but it needed more cameras.
So far I am very impressed with beeper. I cant find anything that does not work well.
Oh, the whole sheep argument is silly. iMessage is better than RCS, and I don’t blame any Apple user for wanting to stay within iMessage if possible. It’s not Apple’s fault that Google took forever to get their act together in the messaging space.
I wish them much success but sounds like a hack.
I bet they do some thing like make it optional on the iPhone and the user needs to turn that setting on to get RCS. Obviously most users don’t care and will never look. 
I pay for YouTube premium, but it’s a lot of money given they have $0 production cost.
Yes. Agreed but this causes confusion. You need online storage.
People need to stop being cheap and always pay for enough storage to have their phones and photos backed up at all time. They complain about paying for anything until they loose their data and then pretend they never knew.
This focus on speed in processors and phones, I think, is silly. They need to have good speed and great build. Having the absolute-latest tech, I just don’t see it as essential.
Same here, every time I make a comment on this topic I get shot back that the fingerprint reader on phone X is wonderful. In my experience, the only fingerprint readers that consistently worked were those on the back of the phone. In either case, I’ll take face unlock any day over a fingerprint reader. Just another thing that Apple got right and then never looked back. 
The fact is that with iMessage it’s pretty obvious that you and the recipients of a message are in a private conversation whose contents is only visible to the participants. With RCS it is not crystal clear. That is an Apple advantage and I see no reason they should give that up. Google likes collecting all that meta data about a conversation. Unlike apple they directly or indirectly sell that data.
But this is not released yet, right? I went and picked a couple audiobooks to listen them to them, but it comes back that I have to go into Spotify on the web and buy them and when I go there, I literally have to buy them there’s no listening to X hours, etc. 
That’s interesting I didn’t know it was limited to the main account. I’m a big audiobook listener, and the idea of being able to listen to something but then move on to something else is appealing. I pay for one credit on Audible every month but I have a lot of books, that after getting into them for a couple hours I realize they’re not really for me. That’s a lot of wasted money.  I wonder if the Spotify is going to give you the option to buy the book? 
You are right. The ones in the screen just don’t work well enough. Why after the pixel 4 they abandoned face recognition is beyond me.
Maybe. My pixel today would no read my finger but fingerprint scanners on all android devices I have tried are flaky.
You’re assuming the bulk of the interaction with your phone is producing content instead of consuming.
Do we know they are monitoring our usage of the launcher?