Where’s your source for this? I’ve never noticed it so it must not be happening
Where’s your source for this? I’ve never noticed it so it must not be happening
Whoa o black Betty
Anyone notice how the thumbnails for each row are essentially the same, even with their order?
They might be talking about a mission? Personally wouldn’t call that trafficking, but it can be pretty brutal depending on the mission
Isn’t the whole thing with renewables that we can’t ramp production with demand and don’t have storage figured out? Use renewables as much as you can, and use nuclear to fill in those gaps.
The storage will probably have a similar lead time anyways and isn’t as proven as nuclear.
I want a bag of paper fibres I can sprinkle into the spill
I stopped at the PS2…
Both sides, amIright?
Probably Nausicaä, but a bunch of the Ghibli main characters are pretty great.
True, but the amount they shrink and grow across the grain tends to be proportional. A 2x4 is very rarely measurably different from 1.5"x3.5", but a 2x10 (like you’ve shown) is 1.5"x9 1/4" but is often anywhere between 9 1/8" to 9 3/8"
In fairness, everyone dies in every political system. Yes I’m fun at parties
Very cool! This sort of tech will only really feel right if you’re waking straight ahead at a steady pace though. As soon as you change directions or otherwise accelerate it won’t feel right because you don’t have to deal with any of the momentum that you normally do.
I like the idea of it being used on inanimate objects for other purposes though. Could this be coupled with the volume to move some props in a way to really sell paralax or movement when viewed in camera? The SFX uses are probably many.
Since it’s what everyone else uses, it’s what I need to use. Good luck getting everyone to switch to another app
For me it’s WhatsApp because it’s the defacto group messaging choice
I don’t think it’s AI, but the very tips if the tails look like Photoshop to me
There’s holes in your pizza boxes?
Just like this famous picture showing how the framing chosen can alter the meaning
This is my first exposure to this idea and it’s quite compelling. Couple that with the perceived tone being argumentative instead of inquisitive or ignorant and that’s a recipe for disaster.
The fact the algorithms only care about engagement, positive or negative, means rage bait takes over too so that doesn’t help the perception that a question is actually an attack.