• 0 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • As long as the phone maker and the phone service company play nice

    I mean both of those things are usually something you can choose yourself?
    I’m aware choices are limited with coverage and availability etc, which is also why i prefixed my statement with should.

    For example here in Finland we have this thing called The Mobile ID. Which is commercial high security identification method, that works on the SIM.

    That seems like a weird implementation, why would you bundle that with your SIM card?
    Seems like a huge headache with stolen/lost phones, wonder how they handle revokation…
    Probably only work for online services that can validate that it hasnt been marked stolen?

    And wouldn’t it make alot harder to swap providers if your entire identity is tied to the card?

    we have a similar thing but it’s a separate physical card you can use for identification, and with that card you can also issue mobile identification.

    This entire discussion seems super offtopic though, but you seem really passionate about the Finnish Mobile ID solution.

    Also physical external sim allows physical update of the crypto processor.

    Are you really arguing that physical security vulnerabilities are easier to solve than a security software update?

    It’s not out of the realm of possibilities that Phone vulnerabilities would affect the SIM card as well?

    Presumably the phone does need to read the private key to authenticate?

    With a software solution you could store the keys on Titan X chip/Apple T2/Samsung Knox(?)

    which the OS knows to protect and keep separate…

    But again, nothing about the mobile ID SIM solution contradicts anything i said?

    eSIM allows for more flexibility overall, the market and availability might not be there everywhere but that is not an issue with the technology but rather it’s adoption (or lack thereof), atleast for all the countries not named Finland.