Avoiding snaps on Ubuntu sadly is not an option anymore. Maybe go for pop!_os Instead of Ubuntu.
Avoiding snaps on Ubuntu sadly is not an option anymore. Maybe go for pop!_os Instead of Ubuntu.
Nah, they tried to sell their own “non-intrusive” ads after blocking the sites’ ads.
Yeah, we pay a lot. We also got one of the lowest downtimes regarding electricity, on average approximately 10minutes per year…so that’s kind of a (small) advantage you get for the premium price
Average load 800W is 0.8kW24h30d=576kWh/M
Which is over 172€ on a 30ct/kWh contract.
Pop os+ Nvidia 3090 user here, no problems
Even apt is deliberately broken:
“[If] You use ‘sudo apt install chromium’, you get a Snap package of Chromium instead of Debian”
How would this not just trigger from any sound rather one specific?
One could only wish
Just my 2 cents:
Proxmox. Flexibility for both new services via VM/LXC and backups (just install proxmox backup server alongside and you get incremental backups with nice retention settings, file-restore capabilities as well as backup consistency checks)
If it’s in a VM/container you don’t need to worry about backups, see 1.
In this case isn’t it sufficient to be able to access the data via Windows network?
Anyone tried upgrading from 6.0?
Is the g15 somewhat similar to the g15? Because I use the latter on pop_os and it works flawlessly with g15stats
So the fans stay loud even when cpu load is low again?
If not this could just be some kinds of “dust prevention”
You could use the system Monitor, it is built-in.
It should, yes. But is it, actually?
Did you check if there is high load when the fan spins up?
Yes,
It does not work. Additionally, the ubiquity switch does not sync with 10gbit/s to one of the qnap switches (I tested with different cables and ports, but the led on the qnap stays orange, indicating connection speed lower than 10gbit/s)
As I’m maybe returning the switch due to the problems I hesitate to register it to access settings. Jumbo frames settings could actually be the solution. But with the problem mentioned in the first paragraph I’m not sure. A 300€ device should just work IMHO…
Thanks for the suggestion with ping, I will test it.
Thanks for your input. All criteria you mentioned are met.
If I build the same connection with the second qnap switch instead of the ubiquity it is working flawlessly.
As I am not sure if I should keep it return it I hesitated to do anything else than using it as a dumb switch.
Because canonical removed packages from apt to prevent users to install their apps from apt instead. Firefox for example.
Firefox from Apt is a link to a snap!
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1399383/how-to-install-firefox-as-a-traditional-deb-package-without-snap-in-ubuntu-22
This is some bullshit level activity that I do not want.
I moved away from Microsoft to not have to deal with such an annoyance. Now canonical is doing it to their users.