Unless it means that Democrats are complicit in lie?
Unless it means that Democrats are complicit in lie?
Sobriety test was to assassinate a local Klan; make some fitted sheets fold.
I will say, the first bidet was cheap and bad. It didn’t clean effectively and didn’t have water pressure options, which I think are required for a good experience.
Again, you don’t seem to have these problems to know and I do.
Screen shot the original sent message with a snarky message like “this you?”
Would you rather wipe that soap off with TP or water?
every fuckdamn time the bidet cultists catch wind
Very easy due to the lack of a clean butt /j
I use one and have IBS with issues as you describe. The bidet is miles better, and previous to that I had to use wet wipes because TP wasn’t even as effective as that. You’re using it incorrectly if you think it’s less effective than paper.
You’re not a leftist… because the right and mild right are bigots?
And Duracell’s don’t explode too (don’t trust everything a salesman tells you)
This makes it much harder to knife them tho
In September 2023, two critical vulnerabilities[108] relating to WebP images were discovered by Apple Security Engineering and Architecture (SEAR) and the Citizen Lab, potentially affecting Google Chrome, Chromium-based browsers and the Google’s libwebp project, among any application implementing libwebp. Among these vulnerabilities, CVE-2023-4863 was an actively exploited vulnerability with a high risk rating of CVSS 8.8. This could lead to an out of bounds/overflow condition in applications using the affected libwebp library, upon exploitation of a maliciously crafted .webp lossless file. This could result in a denial of service (DoS), or worse, enabling malicious remote code execution (RCE). The extensive use of libwebp packages across hundreds of applications, including all categories from web browsers to mobile apps, posed a major patching challenge to mitigate the vulnerability due to the demanding testing requirements before release, highlighting the implications of this vulnerability on a wide scale.
This comment was obviously written by a bot trying to accuse others of being bots to throw you off, don’t believe they’re definitely a bot because they’re spewing propaganda in a bot-like way!
Klingons applications open once a year, see your local starfleet doctor to arrange species-altering surgery today!
…has Google still been giving you the same results recently? This is an extremely weak link in your setup to me. You’d be better off looking at a locally run search engine like peARs or something similar with locally downloaded and indexed files if you insist on using search, and it’ll be waaaay more reliable than an LLM here.
Literally isn’t, which is why you’re hitting a wall.
What I’d recommend, based on the insistence that seeing to not change your workflow, is to locally download the pages you have open with httrack, wget or a similar application. This would allow you to locally search all your tabs and their contents very quickly without Google, they will load faster because of lack of needing to redownload them, which if I understand correctly Firefox is trying to do at some level.
have you tried changing security.ssl.enable_ocsp_stapling
to false in your about:config
?
What a tantrum, finally realized that you can’t actually spend your crypto?
These dudes?