• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • Damn, still couldn’t make it past the first sentence huh? Really hard question too, I’m not surprised you conveniently ignored it given the aptitude you’ve shown so far. Ain’t my fault that you can’t possibly comprehend two things being somewhat similar yet remaining distinct.

    God, I love sealioning.



  • You’re oversimplifying in order to compare the two. Wildly different historical contexts with entirely unrelated events. Distilling both down to “area conquered” just so you can make a point is reductive.

    Beyond that though, why does it matter honestly? Does the fact that a city was conquered in the 1400s invalidate anything mentioned so far?



  • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlHistory
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh well of course, at this point in time it’s been made extremely clear that natives will be getting absolutely no land back, even unoccupied land in the plains for example. There’s no major figures in government even remotely speaking on this stuff in a substantial way, so it may as well never happen. Fucked up stuff on top of all the other fucked up stuff.

    And also to be fair, implying that most anyone here believes that all land should be returned is pretty naive in and of itself - there are absolutely more options than ALL OF THE LAND and NONE OF THE LAND



  • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlHistory
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No reason to not give you the benefit of the doubt, but you’re giving off heavy “they were already killing each other so it’s no big deal” vibes. No insult intended, just what I’m picking up.

    Intertribal conflict is the tribes’ business, colonizing and displacing is colonists’ business. To be clear, external invasion is the concern here



  • Not 1000% on board with your analogy, but I understand and fully agree lol.

    I just wish most people had the empathy and mental capacity to understand the intricacies of this stuff. It’s a hell of a lot easier to just say “uH wOw I ain’t payin reparations for no dang indians” than it is to actually think for a minute about and acknowledge the real history of where you live



  • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlHistory
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That will always be an issue until the US government actually has real communication and cooperation with native people.

    I don’t necessarily think that citizens of occupied land are automatically responsible for the past actions of a government (not to say that’s what you implied), but said government that committed the atrocities is. As far as the other part of the equation, I suppose the beneficiaries should be determined by the natives themselves.


  • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlHistory
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course I’m gonna assume good faith from you here, but I feel like some people boil down issues like this to “well I mean I didn’t do it so stop complaining”, and that’s wildly reductive and irresponsible at minimum.

    Arguing the situation in this way sidesteps the uncomfortable and inconvenient reality that the United States is yet still occupying native land, whether it be Hawai’i, Alaska, or the contiguous territories. Yes it’s entirely possible that mine or your ancestors didn’t perpetuate these things as immigration is and has always been ongoing, but the point everyone misses is that we are still here.

    I couldn’t possibly imagine belittling natives for acknowledging the fact that their land was taken from them by force. Some real colonialist shit.