I’d never heard of STIR/SHAKEN…but after looking into it, supposedly T-Mobile was one of the first mobile carriers to implement it…and I’m on T-Mobile…but for the past several years, I keep getting unwanted spam calls to my cell phone that appears to be originating from very regional local numbers (area codes and number prefixes that are local to my area)…because of that I just assumed that they had to be spoofed since the calls are always an unwanted telemarketing robo call and never involve an actual business that is local to me.

So I don’t know how they are still doing it, but somehow telemarketers are causing calls to route through exchanges that are completely local to me.

I think it’s too late for this to be useful. Number spoofing is ultra-common these days and most of the unwanted calls I receive are from spoofed numbers that appear to come from local areas.

If we start blocking the spoofed numbers then eventually we’ll just be blocking every possible combination of digits that can exist.

What we really need first is better detection and blocking of calls using spoofed numbers.

Are you just talking about dynamic DNS services for one or a few home servers?

There’s always DynDNS, but that’s a paid service. I actually discovered that dynamic IP address service was provided free by Google when using Google Domains as the registrar, so I moved a few of my private domains over to Google several years ago to save myself $55 a year.

Unfortunately, Google Domains is shutting down and all registrar services and existing customer domains are getting moved to squarespace and I’ve not yet been able to determine if squarespace is going to be offering the free dynamic DNS service or not.

Anonymous tips are less than worthless.

The first problem is that anyone who is anonymously tipped on is just going to deny it. And now its the word of a named person vs an anonymous tip. That isn’t going to fly.

The next problem is that people will quickly learn to weaponize the anonymous tip process to persecute the people they dislike - regardless of whether the target was even involved in the vandalism.

Policies like these are dumb. They don’t discourage the bad behavior (the opposite, actually, perpetrators know that the damage they do will impact far more people, which is the entire point of doing it in the first place, so this policy actually works as an incentive to do more vandalism).

TIL, my belief that I have the right to call out bullshit when I see it is considered a religion now.

I had a pair of Galaxy Buds 2 Pro but my dog got ahold of the case and buds…it was a total loss.

I now have a pair of Wyze Buds Pro. They sniped some senior Bose engineers to help design their buds. The ANC on the Wyze buds is superior to the Galaxy buds, but the Galaxy buds are superior for audio fidelity. The wyze buds are not a flat frequency response and tend to be a little heavy on the bass for my taste.

So, if you want superior ANC, go with the Wyze…if you want superior audio, get the Samsung.

The other big benefit of the Wyze buds…they retail for around $90.

While there is merit to your post, I will point out the obvious: your post is hosted on an instance named “lemmy world” and you are citing US enforcement codes and sections, but lemmy.world (the servers) do not reside inside the United States. Lemmy.world (the server) would be subject to the laws of the country in which it is hosted, the admin team would be subjected to the laws in the countries in which they reside, the community moderators would be subject to the laws in the countries they reside, and the lemmy.world users would be subject to the laws frrom where ever they reside.

So, you can’t simply link to a writeup about some US regulations and assume it’s going to be exactly the same everywhere and for everyone.

I thought data caps for home internet were a thing of the past…

For the past 15 years I’ve had a data cap on home internet, but never had a data cap prior to that.

That’s led me to believe the exact opposite of your observation; unlimited data is a thing of the past and data caps are a thing of the present and future.

Pixel tablets are not priced as if Google is “desperate to sell Pixel Tablets”.

I think the author is confusing “marketing team motivation” for “desperation” just because they got a push notification.

This usually means the transmit power on your WiFi access points is too strong. The problem is that the way the current wifi protocol standards are written and implemented, most devices will just hang onto a wifi connection for as long as the connection is still functioning even if there is a superior alternate access point to connect to that’s closer and faster. If you imagine drawing a map of your property, plotting the location of your wifi access points, and then drawing a virtual circle around them that represents wifi coverage, then you want as little overlap as possible between access points, and you do this by intelligent/strategic placement and by adjusting down the transmit power of the access points. There’s free utilities you can download to your device to help you map out these rings. Although some less expensive and less configurable access points probably don’t offer the the ability to change transmit power, prosumer and enterprise gear do. Some signal overlap between access points is unavoidable if you want to also completely eliminate all deadspots on your property, but with minimal overlap your device should be dropping a distant access point as you move out of range and pick up the closer one with the strong signal.

Most people think more power equals more better when it comes to access point signal strength but that’s not really how it works because WiFi is 2-way communication and your mobile device is always gong to be the weak link because it has the weaker transmitter. There’s no reason to broadcast a maximum strength signal from an access point if you have more than one of them.

Much has been written/documented on this topic and you should have enough keywords in the previous two paragraphs to find all the expert instructions for doing it that you could possibly need.

If the same SSID, it should automatically swap to the highest connection strength AP

Unfortunately, that is not part of any WiFi protocol standards. Never has been. It would be amazing if it were.

A few solution providers have bolted on their own proprietary junk to WiFi standards to kinda make this work, but it’s generally expensive and still not flawless.

deleted by creator

They are making an assertion as if it is a statement of fact…and they are, in fact, wrong. That’s ignorant and not helpful for discussion or helpful for understanfing and solving the actual issue. If they had actually asked an innocent question it would be different, but they didn’t. That is why the responses are the way they are.

No, not programmatically. The only way to ‘move’ an instance is for a community of users to create a new community elsewhere and arbitrarily start using it as their preferred community. There is no way to force it and there is no mechanic for moving.

By claiming that the problem isn’t DDOS, you’re just advertising your ignorance. Cloudflair is outstanding for protecting static web content against DDOS, and Lemmy.world is well protected against that. The problem is certain dynamic pages and api calls that can only be rendered from costly realtime dynamic database operations…those are the url that the DDOS attackers are focusing on and those are the kinds of content that cannot be easily protected by cloudflair.

Your premise, though, is still accidently correct. The way to mitigate instances being targeted by DDOS is to spread the user base and community hosting across a vast number of instances so that no one instance is such a rewarding target for DDOS attack.

deleted by creator