I don’t see how this is so difficult. Given the choice between a narcissistic billionaire or an independent, accountable government commission that’s bound by the rule of law, I’ll choose the latter every time.
I don’t see how this is so difficult. Given the choice between a narcissistic billionaire or an independent, accountable government commission that’s bound by the rule of law, I’ll choose the latter every time.
I don’t have an opinion on the matter being discussed
You know it’s an option to just… keep scrolling right? This isn’t high school, you aren’t obliged to leave a comment.
With this approach you would lose the subvolume structure and deduplication if I’m not mistaken.
The Google Play Store has long been the bastion for safe and worry-free app downloads
It’s nice that the article starts with this blatent lie, so that you know everything that follows is just regurgitating Google’s marketing.
Even ignoring that most of the apps in the play store are unreviewed proprietary spyware sending all their data back to Google, there have been many instances of obvious malware being distributed through the play store. It seems like they are trying to sweep that under the rug.
The most common physical attacks will be you misplacing your device or some friend/burglar/cop taking it. FDE works great in those scenarios.
RCS is walled off by design, so that users are dependent on Google and their phone carrier. If they wanted an open standard they would have adopted something like XMPP.
Do you have experience with Spanish employment law?
“Gen Z simply uses technology more than any other generation and is therefore more likely to be scammed via that technology.”
If you turn the fan up high enough it will blow the heat from outside into the house. Trust me, I’m a scientists.
Applying AI-voodoo to a non-existing problem with unknown side effects? Sign me up!
It’s not. Image hosting sites have existed for decades. Websites are not liable unless they have actual knowledge of illegal content and ignore takedown requests. Stop fearmongering.
Good. Hopefully this will discourage people from using Clownflare’s DNS.
In case you don’t know, Cloudflare already controls a massive amount of websites, have access to their unencrypted traffic and are making the web inaccessible for people who use tor or noscript. They are a threat to the open web.
Someone didn’t read the article
Communication network providers in the EU generally aren’t liable for illegal activity of their users.
While it’s stupid that ISPs are using their monopolies to screw consumers, the concept of data caps is not as stupid as you might think.
You’re not just paying for the connection between you and the ISP, but also all the other data links that get your internet traffic to its destination. For example, those cables across the ocean are owned third parties and they charge money for every byte that goes through. It wouldn’t be unreasonable for ISPs to pass that cost to users.
Furthermore, most links are overprovisioned in order to keep costs down. For example, if you assume that users only use 10% of their bandwidth on average, that means you can fit 10x as many people on a connection (or maybe 8x to account for peaks). This does mean that users should be discouraged from using their full bandwidth for long durations, otherwise the network operators can’t overprovision as much and have to invest more in infrastructure.
For the last time: these language models are just regurgitating what people have said. They don’t analyze or reason.
It’s what the ePrivacy directive says, yes. But some get around this by claiming that it’s necessary for the operation of the device/service (doubtful) or that it has limited effect on privacy (depends on exceptions created by member states)
National courts to take EU law into account. If you don’t agree with their interpretation of EU law, your option is to appeal or ask to refer questions to the EUCJ.
Such is the fate of hypercentralized spaces. The fediverse fixes this.