I accept it from the notification and it still comes back. This is for consent-o-matic. Idk, I’ll try again. Maybe this time it’ll work.
I accept it from the notification and it still comes back. This is for consent-o-matic. Idk, I’ll try again. Maybe this time it’ll work.
I’m having the same with an add on. I’ve just been dismissing it when it comes up and hoping a bug fix comes.
They were when the name was made, but due to changes in the manufacturing process, they aren’t anymore. The name stuck, though.
https://www.popsci.com/two-by-four-lumber-measurements-explained/
1 AP, but 8 different SSIDs. Don’t forget to set the strengths on them so they show up in the right order.
Idk but I wouldn’t risk it when it’s easy to encrypt stuff. Good security is done in layers.
What about a torrent? You’ll have to encrypt with 7zip or something to keep it secure, but that and qbitorrent will do the trick.
doesn’t allow you to do anything you can’t do without it.
That’s false. It allows you to not need a password to unlock the volume at boot.
Im really confused why people think TPM needs to be involved in anyway when using LUKS.
Because it’s convenient
The disk will be decrypted on boot, but then they’ll have to contend with needing a password to log in
You won’t be able to upgrade to new versions when the support contract runs out, but you can install updates to the existing version as long as updates are made for it. This has always been the lifecycle for perpetual licensing. It’s good forever, but at a certain point it becomes a security risk to continue using. The difference here is they won’t sell you another perpetual license when the lifecycle is up.
They’re terminating in the sense that they won’t sell it anymore. They’re not breaking the licensing they’ve already sold (mostly, there was some fuckery with activating licensing they sold through third parties)
That’s $8 for the single cigarette
deleted by creator
These are the temps in the notoriously cold Minnesota as well. I’m unsettled and upset.
Well, make love under the stars, I suppose
Oh that’s bullshit
That doesn’t incorporate the hassle factor. Even if you can, it’s a lot more hassle
In this case it’s “Ingress Protection” rating - as in how well it prevents water and dust from getting inside the phone when exposed.
Edit: since I’m on hold and bored, here’s the Bard description of the rating system
The Ingress Protection (IP) rating system is a two-digit code that tells you how well an enclosure is protected against dust and water. Here’s a quick breakdown:
- First digit: This is for solid objects, like dust, fingers, or tools. It goes from 0 (no protection) to 6 (dust-tight).
- Second digit: This is for water, like splashes, rain, or immersion. It goes from 0 (no protection) to 9 (protected against high-pressure water jets).
So, an IP67 rating means the device is dust-tight and can withstand being submerged in water for a short time.
Here are some real-world examples:
- IP44: Splashproof phone, suitable for light rain or spills.
- IP65: Dustproof camera, good for outdoor use but not submersion.
- IPX7: Waterproof smartwatch, can survive a dunk in the pool.
- IP68: Rugged phone, can handle being underwater for extended periods.
Remember, IP ratings are just guidelines. Always check the manufacturer’s instructions for specific usage advice.
Go ahead and update the firmware or change button bindings on an Xbox controller using Linux for me. Go ahead. I’ll wait.