It’s supposedly already open.

Can you make it work? Yes

Should you make it work? No

It’s going to flakey beyond belief for a number of reasons, and you’ll need some pretty complex routing to make it work how I think you’re describing. I would look at using a clustered setup for your auth instead so you never get locked out due to network issues.

Yes. As long as you have enough system resources, you can run whatever. If you want to refer to each service by an A record in DNS, just put a reverse proxy out in front. Otherwise, you can just refer to it’s forwarded port from the container if you wish.

Fedora or Ubuntu have the best installers. I would suggest Fedora.

The first step into the world of owning your tech is knowing what can actually run on it. It’s not just Linux. Just not Windows or MacOS.

If you’re super into what you’ve just accomplished, have a look at the ESP32 ecosystem and behold.

Gotta say, I love the idea behind this project, and it’s great you’re reaching out to this community here. I haven’t run it myself yet, but it looks great, and the feature list is massive.

Couple questions really stopping somebody like myself from setting up an instance though.

1. It’s not “just” a launcher, and it’s not quite a distribution platform. Is this mostly geared towards people playing the same game on multiple machines?

2. It seems like this is setup as a Steam replacement, but only for a DRM-Free games, so why would you (as a creator) suggest I use this instead?

3. This also seems like there’s a world in which this is set to be a decent game hosting platform. Plans?

Thanks for showing up.

I think they are just misunderstanding what Gluetun is for.

What’s the concern?

BitWarden already has lots of clients. There’s also VaultWarden for the server if you want.

This is being blown a bit out of proportion though. All they are saying is the official SDK may have some non-free components going forward. So what? It’s a private company, they can do what they want. Or the community can just fork it and move forward with a free one if they want, but it’s just not going to be in the official BitWarden clients. Hardly news or a big deal.

AMD

Gluetun is for containers. OP is asking about routing.

I criticized the WRITING of what turned out to be the OP for not having any content in their posted piece aside from a complaint about something. Never said he was wrong to feel how we feels about whatever.

Wow, nobody should ever say anything then unless they’re on the right side of everyone else’s opinion or else they might be speaking for everyone. Great tip.

Look up some mini n100 boxes. More than enough to do what you need. I think Minisforum is selling refurb units now.

Well, apologies for being bluntly critical. I can offer a few constructive tips to help with writing about technical topics:

• Try starting with a simple topic flow: topic -> synopsis/purpose of why you’re writing -> background -> observations -> point<>counterpoint loop to elaborate on purpose -> closing
• Stay away from asserting your point in the title unless you’re showing definitive proof of something
• Find ways to speak to who may find your writing useful towards the beginning. “If you have a similar problem like X…”, “People who use X may find…”, or “Anyone having similar X experience may find…”. Something like that.

Why would you think Nix has any bearing on a production environment?

Anytime you see anyone post something like “THIS Is How You Do The Thing”, it should automatically be ignored. This article is no exception.

The author is making a big deal about a team of 40 people and “millions of customers”…k.

Not sure if anyone is supposed to be impressed by that, but the titular argument here isn’t a position for a small team and product, it’s making the case that “ALL THINGS EVERYWHERE ARE TOO COMPLICATED IN PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTS”, which is just an ignorant position to take.

If this had come with some sort of metrics, tools, or workflow to back up the claim, then it would be worth reading. Nothing like that here. This is just an inexperienced person’s boasting rant with zero elaboration about what actually works for them, why, or suggestions for others facing some sort of similar situation.

There is no content here, just time wasted.

Eh, not quite accurate. YouTube was battling DNS ad blocking in browsers. Took them awhile to push to mobile apps to try and do the same, and I still largely never see any YT ads across any of my devices just by using AdGuard in my network. TVs and media players are even further behind in updates of official YT apps that do so. Hell, if your smart TV or whatever isn’t getting regular updates, you may be set just by DNS blocking.

Tailscale doesn’t work on a port by port basis, it works by tunneling traffic from one IP net segment to another. I’m not sure what specifically Tailscale has out in front to work as a proxy for your connection, but the transport itself isn’t blocking ports or anything.

I’m not super sure what you’re asking. I think you have some networking concepts confused with application routing, which in the case of a reverse proxy like this depends on how the forward host is passing requests.