Interesting idea to put wireless devices under the screen, but I don’t think it would be easy to implement. There would be a lot of interference with screen circuits. Also no phone usage while charging. I think it’s better if they stay on the back.
Interesting idea to put wireless devices under the screen, but I don’t think it would be easy to implement. There would be a lot of interference with screen circuits. Also no phone usage while charging. I think it’s better if they stay on the back.
Wireless charging and contactless payments are the main reason manufactures switched from metal covers to glass.
The only reasons people use glass are scratch resistance and because plastic “feels cheap”. I also hate this transition to glass and am glad my Fairphone doesn’t have one.
I have Fairphone 5 and it’s not bad. Little bit pricey and no wireless charging or headphone jack but it should last really long with spare parts for years and easy fix.
The Simpsons or ads?
Never heard of RISC-V?
I hate Nothing because they said they will innovate. But they produced same crappy iPhone-like phone, only with more LEDs on back. Nothing innovative, nothing special, and now even overpriced.
I heard it was planned for 23. June, but postponed because of the protests
Wow, blame the user for manufacturing decisions. Give me an example of alternative with quality camera, wireless charging, water resistance, …
I laughed at Apple (BTW Samsung too) for the aweful cutoff at the top of the screen, for the lack of headphone jack, SD card reader. Now it’s impossible to find powerful phone with these things. So please don’t blame users for stupid corporate decisions.
Also broken glass back compromises water resistance and could be safety hazard if the shards fall of.