Programmer and sysadmin (DevOps?), wannabe polymath in tech, science and the mind. Neurodivergent, disabled, burned out, and close to throwing in the towel, but still liking ponies 🦄 and sometimes willing to discuss stuff.

  • 6 Posts
  • 1.58K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle





  • I downloaded Sora.

    Not Sora, Sora’s app. Sora is a cloud service.

    And if the business model of open AI is advertising

    It’s not, it’s to sell AI services to other businesses.

    Cuz the business model was supposed to be 40% of people lose their jobs

    Was not, it was always to sell AI services to other businesses. Marketing hyperbole… that’s marketing for you.

    in that world, maybe maybe it’s worth half a trillion dollars. In that world, maybe Nvidia is worth the entire pharmaceutical industry combined.

    The largest breakthrough in AI so far, is precisely its use in the pharmaceutical industry.

    But Nvidia is definitely not worth the entire pharmaceutical industry combined

    No, it’s worth more.

    if the business model is making slop talk worse by putting slop advertisements into it.

    It’s not. Not to say there won’t be advertisements, and propaganda, and manipulation… that’s just an extra, not the business model.

    I’m scrolling Martin Luther King Jr. going 67. Like, that’s got to be illegal somehow. Like, I’m pretty sure that you can’t just do that.

    It was not, is not, and public domain is public domain for a reason.
    Asking for something else, is censorship, like what Trump is asking for right now.

    The friction matters. How easy it is to do this stuff matters.

    Censorship talk again.

    And then they put like a little watermark here that’s like extraordinarily easy to crop out. It’s never in the middle. It’s always at the top or the bottom.

    Plenty of videos out there with the watermark right in the middle.

    They shouldn’t be in charge of the kind of thing that could literally by their own admission destroy humanity.

    Hook, line, and sinker. More marketing hype.





  • There is a long history of artists "pushing the envelope… by self-deprecating and making “statements” about how ridiculous the market for art is.

    You don’t get to shove Dada, a Campbell’s soup can, canned “artist’s shit”, a black square on a canvas, a pile of trash, a shirt on a coat hanger, a self-shredding copy of a graffiti, and thousands of similar examples, all under the same label as the Louvre, illustrators, writers, etc… then magically have people value all artistic work.

    There has been continuous, serious, self-damage done to the concept of “art”, and now come the consequences: the general public, thinks the value of art is close to $0, and that’s what they’re willing to pay.

    Coincidentally, AI companies allow anyone to get “better than literal shit” art done for $0… so… 🤷




  • “artists don’t deserve a living wage” or “they don’t do real art”

    Blame the “Modern Art” movement, where a black square, or canned literal shit, can be worth millions.

    At some point, people realized that they don’t need real art, just to decorate an office or house space with “artsy looking” stuff, so they went on a chase to the bottom. That used to be random people from third world countries working for peanuts… now it’s LLMs and GenAI working for fractions of peanuts.

    Same thing has been going in all areas. Who needs a slab of real ice (from a mountain) for their fridge, when they can get fake ice much easier, for a fraction of the cost.