bundling tons of spyware
I couldn’t find any info about this with a quick search. Do you have any links to where I can read more about this?
adding unique IDs to every installation.
I wasn’t familiar with that so I did a quick search. For anyone else interested here is some info about it:
“Internet users who download the Firefox web browser from the official Mozilla website get a unique identifier attached to the installer that is submitted to Mozilla on install and first run.”
[…]
“Firefox users who prefer to download the browser without the unique identifier may do so in the following two ways:”
Download the Firefox installer from Mozilla’s HTTPS repository (formerly the FTP repository).
Download Firefox from third-party download sites that host the installer, e.g., from Softonic.
“The downloaded installers do not have the unique identifier, as they are identical whenever they are downloaded.”
In the comments section someone says:
“It seems that getting Firefox from GNU/Linux repos (Debian, etc.), doesn’t come with unique IDs.”
The shareholders, mostly.
Why? What’s inaccurate about it? I have no idea and would like to learn.
I thought it looked like it’s melting but I see the dress now. So cute!
TL;DR for those who hate clickbait: yes.
“The conclusion is that the two cats can indeed solve puzzles, and gain hours of play from the device.”
To me it looks more like the “I’m about to flop over and show you my belly but don’t you dare try to touch it” position.
Are you really trying to pretend that that’s why you’re voting for Trump? Cute.
Solidarity? It seems a bit excessive:
Donald Trump supporters wore diapers at rallies in spring 2024, holding signs that said “Real men wear diapers.”
They did:
Donald Trump supporters wore diapers at rallies in spring 2024, holding signs that said “Real men wear diapers.”
They did:
Donald Trump supporters wore diapers at rallies in spring 2024, holding signs that said “Real men wear diapers.”
Next instruction: eat a porkchop. You’re looking a bit peckish.
Here’s an article on the Heritage Foundation’s website explaining why they want to help him:
You are just assuming their intentions based on nothing. Why is your assumption more valid than anyone else?
“You guys literally just claim things without any evidence”
How ironic…
You, just a few comments ago:
“that is not how I interpret it or how they intended it”
If you’re so sure of their intent then where is your evidence?
You’re doing the exact same thing you accused the other commenter of; you literally just claimed something without any evidence.