20 years? more like 5
20 years? more like 5
this kinda shit makes me understand the sovcit stuff a little more, “just send an email with this magic subject text and your rights are secured!”
TLS doesn’t encrypt the host name of the urls you are visiting and DNS traffic is insanely easy to sniff even if you aren’t using your ISPs service.
faster can still lead to battery life improvements. if the CPU is able to complete tasks in less time, it can then enter a lower power state sooner which will result in less battery usage overall
SMS is literally the bottom of the barrel though
assuming you have a GNU toolchain you can use the find
command like so:
find . -type f -executable -exec sh -c '
case $( file "$1" ) in (*Bourne-Again*) exit 0; esac
exit 1' sh {} \; -print0 | xargs -0 -I{} cp {} target/
This first finds all executable files in the current directory (change the “.” arg in find to search other dirs), uses the file
command to test if it’s a bash file, and if it is, pipes the file name to xargs
which calls cp
on each file.
note: if “target” is inside the search directory you’ll get output from cp
that it skipped copying identical files. this is because find
will find them a free you copy them so be careful!
note 2: this doesn’t preserve the directory structure of the files, so if your scripts are nested and might have duplicate names, you’ll get errors.
why use docker here? you’re just adding layers of abstraction in an environment that can’t seem to really support them.
that said, switching to 32bit linux, if the VPS supports it, will save you memory.
no, and that’s be a pretty bad idea, you’re opening up all your internal hosts to the public internet.
a VPN is specifically designed to keep all your internal hosts off the public internet. When you authenticate with the VPN server the remote device you are using effectively “joins” the internal network, using the VPN to act like a tunnel between you and your network.
it has the benefits of better security as well as the fact that once you set it up, you can access any services you host, not just HTTP ones.
a surprisingly disappointing article from ars, i expect better from them.
the author appears to be confusing “relay attacks” with “cloning” and doesn’t really explain the flow of the attach that well.
really this just sounds like a complicated MitM attack, using the victim’s phone as the “middle” component between the victim’s physical card and the attacker’s rooted phone.
the whole “cloning the UID attack” at the end of the article is irrelevant, NFC payment cards don’t work like that.