I’m no expert but I believe ffmpeg will be using the rawvideo decoder to read that file. If it appears to work I guess the stream output by v4l2-ctl happens to match up closely enough with the default parameters listed in that doc, you may want to work out what it is and double check compatibility though.

The difference from a regular container is that it’s uncompressed (hence the size) and can’t include any metadata (hence the need to specify parameters manually). v4l2-ctl writing in this format means it doesn’t need to worry about compressing and encoding the video on-the-fly, which would complicate the implementation and might not always be feasible in real-time.

If you wanted to avoid the intermediate file you should be able to pipe v4l2-ctl directly into ffmpeg.

I had come across that! I think I discounted it because of the AI stuff (especially the “global free internet for AI” thing – “if you’re not paying for the product…”), and lack of ROM support. If I can flash Lineage though it might be a contender. Thanks!

Are you using that “AI Internet” and/or the vSIM? Really curious how those work.

As someone in the market for a new phone and unwilling to forego custom ROM support, I find this list very helpful!

My main other criteria are wanting something small (like, 140mm height), and something that works in Australia, which recently forced telcos to completely block anything that doesn’t support VoLTE emergency calls – basically a massive “fuck you” to anyone who has a niche and/or old phone (seriously! This was like 8 months ago now but I didn’t pay attention at the time so all my rage is fresh. Could they not have just required a warning sticker or something and let me make my own fucking decisions??).

Unfortunately this seems to be a losing combination, and I think eventually I’ll have to resign myself to something larger. The other option is to get into ROM development lol, which I suspect requires more sustained motivation than I can muster. And I’d still need a daily driver in the interim.

Interesting, thanks for doing the research!

As an extreme non-expert, I would say “deliberate removal of a part of a model in order to study the structure of that model” is a somewhat different concept to “intrinsic and inexorable averaging of language by LLM tools as they currently exist”, but they may well involve similar mechanisms, and that may be what the OP is referencing, I don’t know enough of the technical side to say.

That paper looks pretty interesting in itself; other issues aside, LLMs are really fascinating in the way they build (statistical) representations of language.

This is a good name for one of the main reasons I’ve never really felt a desire to have an LLM rephrase/correct/review something I’ve already written. It’s the reason I’ve never used Grammarly, and turned off those infuriating “phrasing” suggestions in Microsoft Word that serve only to turn a perfectly legible sentence into the verbal equivalent of Corporate Memphis.

I’m not a writer, but lately I often deliberately edit myself less than usual, to stay as far as possible from the semantic “valley floor” along which LLM text tends to flow. It probably makes me sound a bit unhinged at times, but hey at least it’s slightly interesting to read.

I do wish the article made it clear if this is an existing term (or even phenomenon) among academics, something the author is coining as of this article, or somewhere in between.

GPT-4o mini, “Rephrase the below text in a neutral tone”:

This name is appropriate for one key reason: I have not felt the need to use an LLM for rephrasing, correcting, or reviewing my writing. This is also why I have not utilized Grammarly and have disabled the “phrasing” suggestions in Microsoft Word, which often transform a clear sentence into something overly corporate or generic.

Although I wouldn’t categorize myself as a writer, I have been intentionally editing myself less than usual lately to avoid the typical style associated with LLM-generated text. This approach might come across as unconventional at times, but it can also make for more engaging reading.

I also wish the article clarified whether this term is already established in academic circles, if the author is introducing it for the first time, or if it falls somewhere in between.

“avoid the typical style associated with LLM-generated text” – slop!