- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
ada@piefed.blahaj.zoneto Linux@lemmy.ml•How can we combine two audio recording inputs (mics) into one audio input source in Manjaro?English41·10 days agoWe bypass the issue. We use DJI mini mics, which allow you to connect multiple mics to a single base receiver, and that receiver appears as a stereo sound source.
ada@piefed.blahaj.zoneto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Jeff Geerling: Self-hosting your own media considered harmful (updated). Youtube removed his content, saying that self hosting content is "dangerous or harmful content"English2·11 days agoI don’t know, maybe they have a specific agreement with Patreon or something. But in general, that’s how Patreon like services work with YouTube
ada@piefed.blahaj.zoneto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Jeff Geerling: Self-hosting your own media considered harmful (updated). Youtube removed his content, saying that self hosting content is "dangerous or harmful content"English21·11 days agoIt’s possible to post unlisted videos that are only visible to folk with the URL.
Its good for folk who want to give their subscribers early access
ada@piefed.blahaj.zoneto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Jeff Geerling: Self-hosting your own media considered harmful (updated). Youtube removed his content, saying that self hosting content is "dangerous or harmful content"English31·12 days agoIt’s not one or the other though. Peertube with patreon can exist alongside YouTube
ada@piefed.blahaj.zoneto Technology@beehaw.org•YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial contentEnglish142·13 days agoWhy does the general attitude on Lemmy seem to lean toward more censorship and silencing of speech
Because “censorship” in this context is a weasel word. What people complaining about censorship really want, is the ability to be more openly racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic etc. What people pushing back against that want is less bigotry.
But because the bigots can’t own their bigotry, they hide behind “censorship” and not having enough “free speech”.
This is literally youtube saying “The president says that hating on folks is ok, and we will make more money by aligning with that”. It’s not them taking a stance on free speech, because they still block stuff that costs them money. They still demonetise or block things that are supportive of LGBT folk for the flimsiest of reasons, none of which they would do if censorship or free speech were their reasoning.
This has nothing to do with “censorship” and everything to do with a deliberate attempt not to increase free speech, but to shift “allowed” speech to the right
That was my immediate question too!