Did MS deliver a product through Crowdstrike? Maybe that’s what I’m missing here. I don’t use Crowdstrike myself, so I’m not sure how it relates at all to MS except that it works on Windows.
Did MS deliver a product through Crowdstrike? Maybe that’s what I’m missing here. I don’t use Crowdstrike myself, so I’m not sure how it relates at all to MS except that it works on Windows.
This article is a lot more clearly written, as expected from Cloudflare. For example, the other article makes it sound like 55% of all user data was lost. Cloudflare says:
During the roughly 3.5 hours that these services were impacted, about 55% of the logs we normally send to customers were not sent and were lost.
55% of logs during a 3.5h window is a lot less of a big deal.
Unless I’m missing what they’re referring to, I don’t see why MS even comes up related to Crowdstrike. A software dev that deploys to Windows making a royally bad mistake doesn’t exactly make that MS’s fault.
I’ve already started making arrangements with my employer so I can hopefully stay employed with them. It’s happening, just a question of when now.
The other walk is happening too, for what it’s worth.
As someone who does not use TikTok, what reality am I unaware of?
On this topic, I remember seeing a thread for Frostpunk 2 asking if it had DEI stuff in it.
There aren’t even any real characters in Frostpunk 2. Tf are you talking about DEI for in a game with no real characters?
So, in other words, it’s so users excuse it when it produces dog shit. Got it.
Playing FFXIV for the first time.
I don’t really care for multiplayer games as much since I don’t like to commit my time to others to play games (I like being able to get up and leave when I need to), but there’s a solo challenge that sounded fun, so I’m giving that a shot.
Yeah, the timing of the article makes it clear what the motive is. It’s to distract discussion away from the article about Stallman.
Up to you. Two people can make mistakes at the same time. Whether there is truth to the claims, I’m not sure, but if there is truth then there are some unpleasant details in it.
Is this supposed to be a leading question? I’m not making the decisions, but there’s no reason to be happy about losing contributors in any case.
It’s supposed to put the LF in line with sanctions rather than at risk. They have no control over the invasion (aside from pushing a malicious patch that shuts down all Linux systems or something)
My understanding is that users can edit the chat themselves.
I don’t use c.ai myself, but my wife was able to get a chat log with the bot telling her to end herself pretty easily. The follow-up to the conversation was the bot trying to salvage itself after the sabotage by calling the message a joke.
Factorio. Probably for the next month or so as well.
TL;DR:
From today the license applied to the project will be the Apache 2.0 license with an extra line forbidding usage of the codebase as an integration or app to Atlassian’s Confluence or Jira products.
While it’s disappointing to see the additional restriction, it’s better to have a project the devs find sustainable than to have nothing at all. It seems like the goal of this change is to protect their main source of funding.
Worst case, people can fork the code before the change.
I’ll give it about two weeks before some random court in Texas tries to block it.
Factorio is not for everyone, but it’s also one of the all stars of its genre. With the upcoming expansion in a couple weeks, it’ll probably eat another few hundred of my free hours over the next few months, and I know I’m not alone on this one.
Same devs also made Sea of Stars. I found it to be pretty fun.
Nah, that’s not him. We were hanging out that day. That’s not your guy. Sorry officers!