- Astroturfing is trivial, they have a dedicated groups of people doing it and they do it everywhere it’s their job
- Maybe so, but that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t prefer it if Mozilla got behind Manifest V3
Mozilla doesn’t need 80% of its revenue to do a good job of maintaining a browser codebase. So it’s a good thing that that funding could disappear, Mozilla could fold like a lawn chair and the next open-source fork that everyone got behind would pick right up and probably do a better job at the core task than Mozilla is.
This idea that open-source software requires more than a dedicated contributing community is (one of many) memes created by the likes of Google and Microsoft in order to snuff out FOSS competition.
I’m convinced that 80% of all these threads and the responses within them are astroturfing by Google to cause everyone to despair that Mozilla is no better than Google and that there will never be anything that could be developed to compete with Google if Mozilla went under.
There’s just too goddamn many of them and they’re all filled with the same negative comments. It’s just like the “no way bro, I love paying for YouTube why you gotta have everything for free bro?” bullshit from a few months ago.
So… they think it will… vaccinate them?
I’m sorry, which editor allows you to exit easily with escape colon q bang enter?
Uh huh. That’s what I thought.
What is religion, if not conjecture about the origin of mankind (and by extension the universe) that people believe without evidence?
Religion identifies the simulator and insists that its intermediaries can offer a liaison between you and them, and also that if you don’t believe in their particular simulator, you will be punished. It has been used for centuries to control the populace and to take their money.
A proponent of simulation theory isn’t likely to tell you that it solves any philosophical problems, or that they now understand the universe wholly. I’ve never heard anyone talking about it claim that they know who/what is behind the simulation.
So IMO the distinction between the two couldn’t be more clear.
I imagine there’s at least a couple wacko groups out of there trying to twist simulation theory into a purely religious endeavor, but that wouldn’t represent the mainstream conversation about it.
ChatGPT’s Answer:
The expression 6/2(1+2) involves both multiplication and division. According to the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS), you should perform operations inside parentheses first, then any multiplication or division from left to right.
Let’s break down the expression step by step:
Inside the parentheses: 1 + 2 = 3
Now the expression becomes 6/2 * 3
Division: 6/2 = 3
Multiplication: 3 * 3 = 9
So, 6/2(1+2) is equal to 9.
Amazingly well put. Capitalism is necessary. Unrestrained capitalism is deadly. The unfortunate reality of capitalism is that even as it is in the process of burning everything to the ground, it looks for all the world like glorious success. And it is glorious success, if you don’t compare it to what could be in a system where it was properly restrained.
Soaking seems like a particularly egregious loophole.
Boy does this ring true. I worked for years for a giant multinational publisher and one of their biggest sources of income was taking government money for educational stuff for schools and turning that money into absolutely no useful products while making sure no opportunity to hire another middle manager was overlooked.
OMG so beautiful. And a beauty mark! I have a similar boy.
No, dynamic content should absolutely be able to be delivered through the open Web, not just through walled gardens. Apps are almost universally shit.
Pockets was beautiful, kinda reminds me of my cat, he too has left us. I’m really sorry. I know it is hard.
Spicy cole slaw topping a sandwich made of slow-smoked pulled pork is absolute nirvana.
Oh come on, who reads a book while they’re getting head?
I honestly am not sure that there is a more perfect confection than chocolate covered raisins, not even kidding.
I don’t get this. So… no candy canes? No Andes mints? No Altoids? No mint juleps?
They look so awesome. Brings a tear to my eye. I had a pair very similar to them, mine are sadly no longer with us. This is Salty and Bug, they were not best buds, but they mostly tolerated each other:
deleted by creator