It’s as much on the customers as it is on the workers. Why continue supporting companies that don’t pay livable wages?
It’s as much on the customers as it is on the workers. Why continue supporting companies that don’t pay livable wages?
Yes that’s true.
Are you intentionally making bad faith arguments?
No, lets keep this civil my guy.
She is a social media manager, onlyfans is social media regardless of the content that is usually posted. As for the reason I brought up Facebook moderation is, what do you think is usually posted there? Minion memes? Photos from trips? Well those moderators are often subjected to beheadings, rape, and other very graphic content. Do you think that was explicitly stated when they got hired?
Of course, Facebook isn’t exactly the premier ‘good place to work’, but this is common throughout any industry that takes submissions for the populous. And I am not making any arguments whatsoever on whether or not she should actually have to see “comments from people talking about how they wanted to fuck me and my co workers.”.
She is not publicly facing on OnlyFans she manages the account. So her being a woman has absolutely nothing to do with your last sentence. Of course I won’t debate your personal opinion, but she isn’t being forced. It’s a job within her job description.
What do you mean by sexual abuse?
I don’t know what you mean about harassment for life. She wasn’t publically facing on the OnlyFans. And yes I have seen. You didn’t answer my questions however.
She’s just the manager of the account, not publicly facing on OnlyFans. She was asked to complete a task well within her job description, that is not against her will, she is against the job. A before you say looking at genitalia wasn’t in the job description I urge you to look up what facebook moderation is like.
Why “a woman” specifically? And how would that be against her will?
Here are a few examples that could support the claim that Republicans have opposed net neutrality regulations:
Here are some sources that could counter or provide an alternative perspective to the claim that Republicans uniformly oppose net neutrality:
As for your last point, you act like any of those dinosaurs know how to.
My LG V60 didn’t have this problem. I used Niagara and Nova launcher full time on it.
Infinity for Lemmy just dropped, typing from it now.
No way that game has enough content or is complex enough to justify 135GB. What it is is unoptimized crap. And since storage keeps getting cheaper studios have no incentive to fix it.
There’s 1TB SATA SSDs for $35 at my local best buy.
All-day use when plugged in is the stupidest marketing I’ve seen from apple.
Playing devil’s advocate here, but there’s spillters for that.
Where’s the funny?
You are correct my good sir, I imagine their excuse would be that it subsidizes the device.
Depends on your phone provider really. AT&T? Chocked full of crap. Verizon? Chocked full of crap. TMobile? Barely anything. Google Fi also doesn’t install anything.
Let’s not even get started on unlocked, AT&T devices blocking updates unless you’re using their service.
The end goal of a social media platform is for users to use your platform. You want them engaging with content and ads. Rate limits are actually quite sensible if you want to prevent bots or data scraping, but the Twitter is being far too restrictive.
Lots of people are claiming to get rate limited after a few minutes of normal scrolling. Which makes me think these limits include replies as well. Realistically your not scrolling through, and Twitter isn’t loading 600 posts for a least a couple hours. Even then, do you not want people using your platform?
There’s nothing more I want out of a phone than what I have with the P9F right now. Price should come down, but I’m using this thing until it’s dead. Only other thing that could entice me is a rollable like LG was going to release here.