

That’s abridgement of the First Amendment.


That’s abridgement of the First Amendment.


First Amendment guards against state repercussions for speech, with exceptions. Careful not to conflate the legal and colloquial usages.
That card lock isn’t to keep someone else from stealing your card, it’s to make you take it. As long as the machine will only do what you’ve asked after you take your card, the bank isn’t responsible for your card at all.
I’ve seen machines that still hold the card so it can’t be removed (even though it remains visible), and will only release the card before completing whatever transaction you’ve asked it to do. Like, you have to take the card before it’ll tell you your balance or give you cash or whatever. This is 100% a “we’re not taking responsibility for you leaving your card in the machine” thing.
My dog will insist on having food put in his bowl at the appropriate times, even if he isn’t hungry, just because “that’s what’s supposed to happen.” He also demanded his water bowl be filled up last night because it was empty … and then didn’t drink any. Just “there’s supposed to be water in there.”


OP is clearly conflating “Americans” with some very specific people they have a fair beef with.


I have yet to see any evidence americans will “use their guns” against fascists.
The people who have traditionally yelled about 2A and “the gubmint” taking their guns are today’s fascists. Besides that, using firearms to topple a fascist regime that controls the most powerful military the world has ever seen will require a great deal of organization, planning, coordination, supply, and about ten times as many people doing non-“infantry” stuff to have a snowball’s chance in hell of being successful - let alone the political support of a whole lot of state and local governments.
Not sure what you think should be happening short of a full civil war. I mean, that’s what it’s gonna take, and that’s what’s gonna happen, but you can’t seriously think that the practical foundations are yet in place for it.
It’s a fine distinction, I was being pedantic. During my early mornings, I am very rigid-minded until the coffee kicks in.
It’s amazing how a cat can cuddle you after doing something like that to your face.
Bad OCR of the long s.


They weren’t saying the tax should be levied per passenger, only that the tax structure as it stands probably already scales well if you calculate per passenger.
deleted by creator


Pravda


My dog does this because he wants you to scratch his armpit. When he’s done with the one armpit, he’ll switch so you can do the other one.


Might, but that article is in reference to digital products and not physical ones.


I can’t imagine that’s enforcible. It is a reasonable expectation that when you purchase the product, you are free to use the product without further limitations being put upon you. They’d have to have you agree to arbitration before purchase, wouldn’t they?


Removed by mod
To be fair, whatever Michael does is “cat stuff”.