

Yeah, every dev does that to a degree of one ticket, which shouldn’t take more that 2 days on average. So no, hiding code for half a year isn’t ok. I don’t know why you try to normalize it.


Yeah, every dev does that to a degree of one ticket, which shouldn’t take more that 2 days on average. So no, hiding code for half a year isn’t ok. I don’t know why you try to normalize it.


So just push everything to open source then, not only releases but branches? Nobody forces you to have fast release schedule, but you either open source or you are not. Releasing sources 2 times a year is not an open source.


I think it has the opposite problem, they start with the same question at the same time and most vote immediately.


If only there was such a thing like bluetooth to connect mobile apps to local devices


So 5 times more overhead to guarantee the safety of data, that is x5 more cost cause it’s not like regular people have servers with lots of memory just sitting at their homes.


It’s also much harder to guarantee preservation with distributed archive. Example: torrents with 0 seeders.
Like I understand that if I buy a phone from Apple, and they control everything on the phone and what I can install - well I mean I bought it from Apple, what else did I expect?
But I didn’t buy my phone from Google. They should have no say in what I could or couldn’t install.
Is that one machine?