I think their point is that if the people making the games were given fair compensation that they would be more willing to sacrifice IP rights.

I don’t see what makes them think that other than their own personal feelings on the matter, but I think that’s the message.

People don’t like the things they believe to be challenged, and many people fail to recognize what is a belief and what is a fact.

It’s the problem with knowing enough to not know how little you actually do (know).

You can certainly make an argument for young kids, i.e. teaching fractions and literally how to count (counting seconds).

Teenagers? No, not really. They’ll all have phones or something to tell the time by a certain age and hopefully they know their fractions / how to count. It might as well just be digital at that point.

A strawman that may actually be true, given how much poison the rich have dumped into our environment.

“I am not pleased tiny human.”

Then why is this hard to understand?

Do you stick your hands down your shorts to prevent the water pulling them against your skin?

Do you wear speedos?

Do you wear speedos?

How long has it been since you last swam?

Are ya’ll really confused about this?

I think that depends on whether you like Cool-Aid or not.

The only way Homelander beats Superman is if he has Kryptonite. Neither side would have a fair victory, Homelander would have to cheat or Superman would just win in a landslide.

That must be a different game then, I’ve played Terraria but never Terrerria.

The most popular boxed mac n cheese, again boxed mac n cheese is not the only kind to exist.

That would be like associating all Ramen with ‘Top Ramen’. Does that put in perspective how wrong* what you’re suggesting is?

*Edit: I’m trying to be nicer.

What’s your point?

It’s cheap.

So do many Americans, and yet I didn’t invoke their name first.

I can’t understand how non-Americans have gone their entire lives without witnessing macaroni and cheese that exists outside of Kraft.

Other way around