Now i want to play cards against humanity lol

… you could just put your card on the back of the phone too

I recognize this line but what’s the relation to this post? Is it something in the lyrics or something else?

For reference from uber eats near vancouver bc

You misread that. Sounds like you are being defensive.

They are saying the person likes the ones that ARE shallow.

Outlier 100%

I mean that’s been a “thing” since at least the late 80s. Not that i think its accurate but its all too common an opinion you will find that isnt completely batshit crazy.

…Meanwhile im over here clear all on close

TWS?

Ide follow that up with Carmina Burana oh fortuna - Carl Orff then strap into Ride of the Valkyries - Richard Wagner since we got 30 minutes

3 other words Ride the Lightning

Thank you so much. I try! Sometimes i even succeed.

Much love guv!

Also wrong, you are more valuable than you are giving yourself credit for! You have lots of people you can choose to mentor by having a conversation with them or at least in front of them. Thats incredibly relevant to understanding your opinion that HP is Isekai.

You totally got this, if you want this, my guy!

Glad you can admit that you are wrong lol (I’m joking if that isn’t obvious)

There’s lots of good isekai. But like horror or many other genres really depends on what you like about the Isekai genre.

Delicious in Dungeon is okay but its also bad in its own way(I’m suddenly watching and enjoying it on Netflix about 8 episodes in)

It could be better.

Ascendence of a bookworm is worth it if someone wants an isekai that feels different.

Hard disagree on Harry Potter as Isekai.

You have made a statement that says to me the same thing as squares are rectangles so rectangles are squares

More explanation needed if you care to convince me you are right. I dont expect you to care about my opinion. Just taking a stance on your opinion.

Ide still buy you a beer to have a conversation about it though, could be fun

Rimworld (Survival. Very quirky, choose your own survival adventure)

Hades. (Made me feel like i was renting video games for the snes and trying to play it all weekend long)

Backpack Hero. (Indie game, bit of tetrising needed, loot adventure with a decent turn based combat for what it is)

Dead Cells. (Lot of humour packed into a metroidvania platformer. Roguelite gives it a lot of replayability. Reminds me of Hades but sidescrolling goodness)

Valheim (Viking survival game. They specifically wanted to go low poly and get the feel of something like OG Tombraider)

TYL

Be honest and accurate please.

Razing the earth is not a goal of capitalism.

Capitalism does not give a fuck about processes. Its goal is simply money/wealth/value above all else. The consequence of the goal is not the goal.

If your statement became the new message of an anti-capitalist movement, and that would be awesome please do it, it would give the masses an easy lever for the powers that be to utilize against you.

A truth I hold is that the masses can make changes. It happens all the time by tacit approval. Simply not acting against something enough allows it to continue. But it takes numbers. Where when and how much changes, but the amount needed is always the same: enough IS enough

We the people only have power in numbers. Thats the only tool we get. If you get enough of us acting in unison we become a mob. And that is as much power as we will ever have against the powers that be. If the mob exceeds enough by enough it wont stop until it dissipates or is destroyed.

What im getting to(admitedly probably badly, apple oh geez) is that messy messages with inaccurate inclusions gives opponents to the message an easy tool to get people to dismiss it. Dont give them that tool. Because people can be very great, but en masse we are simple.

It takes people who dont understand a subject, acting for or against it, to make a change from the people. And if you dont know about something on your own, you are unlikely to trust a message that someone points to and says "you are wrong here, why should they believe you?” simple people have a pass or fail mentality when it comes to things they dont know enough about. It is why its so hard to keep people from breaking away from a movement.

Another truth i hold is that conservatives will always have an advantage because of the nature of that which i know vs that which is new. If the message never differs people will fall in line with accepting it eventually. And being conservative that means they will always have the advantage of the devil you know. New things will have unpredictable consequences. (Also predictable ones!) And thats enough of a barrier to keep people away from them until its been known long enough to be less risky.

Hello friend, nice to meet you!