No it’s not. It’s pedantic and arguing semantics. It is essentially useless and a waste of everyone’s time.
It applies a statistical model and returns an analysis.
I’ve never heard anyone argue when you say they used a computer to analyse it.
It’s just the same AI bad bullshit and it’s tiring in every single thread about them.
I literally quoted the word for that exact reason. It just gets really tiring when you talk about AIs and someone always has to make this point. We all know they don’t think or understand in the same way we do. No one gains anything by it being pointed out constantly.
I mean they literally do analyze text. They’re great at it. Give it some text and it will analyze it really well. I do it with code at work all the time.
Because they are two completely different tasks. Asking them to recall information from their training is a very bad use. Asking them to analyze information passed into them is what they are great at.
Give it a sample of code and it will very accurately analyse and explain it. Ask it to generate code and the results are wildly varied in accuracy.
I’m not assuming anything you can literally go and use one right now and see.
One of LLMs main strengths over traditional text analysis tools is the ability to “understand” context.
They are bad at generating factual responses. They are amazing at analysing text.
Got to practise firing cannons mate
Exactly. Look at the state of it. We definitely should have taken that.
In fairness it likely wouldn’t be preserved otherwise. So you’re welcome.
World of warcraft in the earlier days was very social as there were lots of things you simply couldn’t do on your own.
There was no built in LFG mechanic and even many quests required small groups.
You’d end up bumping into the same people regularly due to similar play times and levels.
I forged some really great friendships back then.
People need money mate. Not everyone can afford to run a website.
I’m afraid it won’t last long without it. That’s the key problem.
People hate ads, as do I, but what’s the alternative?
And, for the foreseeable future at least, advertising is a key commercial engine of the internet, and the most efficient way to ensure the majority of content remains free and accessible to as many people as possible.
I’m afraid they aren’t wrong. The majority of people aren’t going to pay for access to random blogs etc. So we’d end up with only the big players having usable sites.
People kick off about ads but rarely suggest an alternative to funding the internet.
Back in the day ads were targeted based on the website’s target audience not the user’s personal data. It works fine but is less effective. Don’t see why they couldn’t go that way.
The problem with those sorts of forks is they still require moz to do most of the heavy lifting.
If Firefox stopped being developed they’d all pretty much freeze in place.
It has an orange end and triggers on it which marks it as a toy gun. So they’d be fine most likely. But it’s still a stupid move.
There’s loads of options.
Plenty of science that could potentially save us if invested properly.
Lab grown meat. Carbon capture. Using said carbon capture for building materials. Nuclear fusion. Outer atmosphere energy generation. Etc.
There’s also cutting back on our consumerism.
Once it gets bad enough that it affects the super rich the world’s governments will miraculously and quickly act as one.
Why not just use the windows machine?
I don’t think they’re pushing trump. More saying Gaza is fucked regardless.
Stardew valley is just fantastic and still receiving free updates.
Grim dawn is an amazing diablo2 style arpg. The dual class system means it has huge replayability. Still getting updates and very reasonably priced dlcs.
Kenshi is a unique gaming experience. If you can get past the jankiness it’s an amazing open world squad game with no story or objectives as such. The story of your characters emerges from the things that happen as you play. Like getting enslaved etc.