https://lemmy.world/comment/12081117
Some on Lemmy are still pro-LLMs. Quite a lot of folks actually.
https://lemmy.world/comment/12081117
Some on Lemmy are still pro-LLMs. Quite a lot of folks actually.
The brilliant minds of Lemmy yesterday: " we’re way past caring about GHG emissions" when talking about the LLM-craze of 2023.
Nice!
I think I’ve made my case here, everything I could respond to that is visible in the exchange we’ve had. Good night!
The facts are there: the consumption of animal products the way it is done across the vast majority of the planet is not something you can rationalize: it’s bad for the consumers, bad for the environnement and, most of all, bad for the animals that are being slaughtered on a massive scale.
Don’t fool yourself: I’m not talking about the act of ingesting the flesh of dead animals, which could theoretically be done in a way that doesn’t have such a strong negative impact on everyone involved. I’m talking about what’s happening in the real world, which is very far from idealized “what if” theories that are pretty unattainable, and an artificial debate construction carnivores use in debates with vegans.
You and I consume animal products. The difference between the two of us is I find the moral objections to the consumption of dog meat to be rationally indefensible, and pretty ridiculous.
Do consume animal products if you like. I’m not a vegan, and I would be hypocritical to judge you based on that. Whatever you do though, just don’t make the mistake of assuming your moral system is universal because it’s pretty illogical.
In short, get off that high horse.
The question “would you eat dog meat?” and your outrage at the question, while a gotcha, is a very solid way to point out your inconsistency. It’s by no means dishonest because it outlines your inconsistency without false pretense. You’re being asked a direct question, and you got got.
You don’t get a free get-out-of-jail card because you don’t like how this rhetorical device proved your position weak.
No it’s not. It being a “gotcha” does not mean it’s wrong. In fact, it is still right, you’re just wrong and think the person you reply to is wrong because they disagree with you.
Think about battery life too 🎉
Probably because it’s more efficient. GPUs are designed to render things, which editors do. In a text editor, you’re effectively rendering fonts over a fixed background, which I assume is pretty efficient using the GPU.
We’re not talking about crazy 3D effects here.
Yay to battery savings!
Balzac = Ballsack
It is, you just need the proton bridge. I use it on a Mac and it works well.
Yet another war crime apologist!
See, a war crime is when Americans kill civilians. China and Russia are allowed to kill civilians, that’s different.
At least you probably understand why you and your scummy lookalikes can’t convince anyone.
The “class war” used to oppose nobility to the rest of the population. Nobility has been mostly replaced with capitalists. Same opposition.
Any source on this claim about the declaration?
Maybe because they’re selling property at a loss? I don’t actually know, just guessing
No idea, but if I had the money, fuck, I’d take that swell-looking kitchen.
No need for unproductive name-calling. I didn’t disrespect you.
I’ve had to turn off RCS because, when you don’t have WiFi/great cellular data access, you can’t do shit. I couldn’t even open the messages app.