If the traffic is encrypted, how would they know?

You can do 4 just fine, it just looks goofy

Where’s the meme

I would tell my younger self to go to a psychiatrist and get some antidepressants about 2 years earlier than last time.

reverse psychology mm I like it

Keed using it, set up smartd to check up on it regularly and send you an email if something goes wrong.

buy and maintain, it probably costs over $1M/yr in fuel and spare parts

doesn’t work for me in boost ):

I think it’s like this: what used to be group in regular permissions output is a union of group and ACL mask in ACL output. Mask sets the upper limit of what ACL can do, so if mask is rw- then it’s impossible to set a r-x ACL permission because allowing execution is not allowed.

This seems to be more geared towards enterprise environment where it could be complicated to cleanly define groups, since you can only give access to one you might run into a problem where dept. A needs access to that directory but also person G from dept. B and person K from dept. C.

Futureproofing, I guess, but also I’m sure there are things other than language models that can benefit from a dedicated processing unit, like photo processing, smaller models, Lens, etc.

If it’s all in the cloud - yes. If some/most of it runs locally - still yes with a caveat - hardware acceleration can make it run both faster and at a lower battery cost, same how every computer has a dedicated graphics chip, whether as a separate expansion card or a separate module on the CPU. Yes, you technically can do all that math on CPU, it’s called software rendering, but rendering done with a purpose-built chip is so much better. Same logic applies to “AI”.

Oh hey, OpenDyslexic font.