![](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/c0cfeb4a-171a-4594-81b2-2916cf0f063a.jpeg)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
I claim the Isle of Wight.
I claim the Isle of Wight.
I only purchased this toothbrush because that was the only way to get the water-resistant Corporate Surveillance Device that I wanted for the bathroom.
why
in
the
name
of
christ
I love Miles’ work. Hes one of the few people of approximately my generation speaking openly and directly about the actual, observed risks involved in AI without hype or drama, and that in a very accessible way.
AI told me the Pope shit in the woods and that bears are Catholic.
Enshittification happens because there is a lucrative incentive to sell access to users by cannibalizing the user service itself.
Is it because humans treat black- and white- sounding names differently?
Edit: It’s because humans treat black- and white- sounding names differently.
Schrodinger’s rhetorical question is when you decide whether your question was rhetorical or not based on people’s reaction to it.
“Tools for moderating IMAGES now?! When will you beehawists stop with the entitlement?!?!” -lemmy devs, probably
If I understand correctly, a gerund is the noun form of a verb- a verb turned into a noun. “A building is building” the first building is a noun, it is the thing being built. The second is a verb, the act of being built. Google tells me gerunds are supposed to end in -ing, but “reddit is an enshittifying” doesn’t quite sound right, so I used an adjective form. It’s very possible I don’t understand correctly.
I think enshittification can be a gerund too, like building.
“Reddit is an enshittification.”
That’s a relief >_>
So can I disable youtube’s access to the history api? perhaps disable all access generally to see if that fixes it?
edit: The only thing I know about APIs is that reddit is shit now.
…websites can see my history?
I seem to recall something to the effect of “theft of a prototype:” like a custom water block or something like that he was supposed to review, and then gave a rushed, improper review, and then misplaced or in some way failed to return the prototype. IIRC.
It does seem to be the thinnest available criticism here.
I think the idea is that Linus is a hypocrite.
I know what phone I’ll be looking for when the piece of shit in my pocket finally dies. That maneuver where he popped the cover with a fingernail and hotswapped the battery sold me.
Hey, totally unrelated question: Didn’t linus recently take a lot of flak for shady/unfair reviewing practices?
Very on-brand move from them.
4chan?