If you don’t need enterprise level hardware and support, I can suggest MinisForum. They released the MS01 fairly recently and I believe it fits your specs.
That’s the problem, if anyone somehow gets your root CA key, your encryption is pretty much gone and they can sign whatever they want with your CA.
It’s a lot of work to make sure it’s safe in a home setup.
I’m talking about home hosting and private keys. Not businesses with people whose full time job is to make sure everything runs fine.
I’m a nobody and I regularly have people/bots testing my router. I’m not monitoring my whole setup yet and if someone gets in I would probably not notice until it’s too late.
So hosting my own CA is a hassle and a security risk I’m not willing to put work into.
The domain certificate is public and its key is private? That’s basically it, if anyone gets access to your key, they can sign with your name and generate certificates without your knowledge. That’s my opinion and the main reason why I wouldn’t have a self hosted CA, maybe I’m wrong or misled, but it’s a lot of work to ensure everything is safe, only for a self hosted setup.
For self hosting at least, having your own CA is a pain in the ass to make sure everything is safe and that nobody except you has access to your CA root key.
I’m not saying it’s not doable, but it’s definitely a lot of work and potentially a big security risk if you’re not 100% certain of what you’re doing.
That sounds like a bad idea, you would need your CA and your root certs to be completely air gapped for it to be even remotely safe.
She loves to sing the song of her people when kibble is late (by 2 minutes and she’s gonna starve to death)
Oh shit, I was miserable back when I installed Arch. Dang, you might be onto something there!
That’s strange, apart from installing it, Arch is pretty painless to run if you’re not careless
It’s an exhausting life, you can’t understand
You can read about SELinux here or ACLs here. SELinux can be pretty complex if you’ve never used it, so make sure you understand it well. I believe it should be able to do what you want to achieve.
I guess you can use ACLs depending on your filesystem, or SELinux user contexts.
Yeah that would incite you to lie from now on.
He’s not wrong but he sounds like a jackass. A minimal version sounds better than removing features that are present and used by people.
Israel has weaponized antisemitism, it’s not even a secret and they admitted it a while back. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaponization_of_antisemitism?wprov=sfla1
She suffers from resting bitch face unfortunately
Nope, she’s just a very sassy cat with a lot of fluff 😁
If you buy three of them you can set up a Ceph cluster I suppose ahah. That would solve part of your issue of having storage and compute on the same node.