

Ghislaine, for the sake of any searches


Ghislaine, for the sake of any searches


It actually is mentioned in the sidebar, though they should make it a hotlink


The last time that happened, the delivery service refunded that item, so it was actually mildly enjoyable.


Define ‘CEO’. Because legally a guy running a food truck is a CEO if he owns it.


Check the comm


Yet, within just a few months of being sworn in, Fertitta has allegedly complained to Trump about a swarm of self-styled Italian and American emissaries and makeshift middlemen eager to influence relations between Rome and Washington.
It’s almost like we need an ambassador there to deal with these people.


Obligatory that’s exactly what a bot would say comment


Utilisation is good, but overcrowding illustrates the point of this meme, which is that the public transit system is being neglected and hasn’t kept pace with demand.


Tragedy is not usually due to a single cause. Multiple failures have to happen for a tragedy to occur. In this case, the mum left them unattended, and the manufacturer implemented a feature in a dangerous way. It should have been obvious in the design phase that this was a risk, to pets if nothing else. The solution is also well known, there have been groups lobbying to make occupant sensors standard for literally decades. That they implemented one without the other is arguably corporate negligence for nothing more than extremely minor cost savings.


I agree. But that doesn’t really address the issue under discussion


The kids died because the engine auto shut off, so it’s actually an interesting question as to whether the manufacturer bears responsibility for having implemented a ‘feature’ dangerously.


Wouldn’t the dealers / shops by the most motivated to find the problems, if that’s the case?


Not gonna make much of a difference unless you take your mum with you.


Don’t know the exact mechanism, but EU countries have national ID database, so unless you’re committing actual identity theft your signature will be invalidated.


Signatures will be verified at the end of the petition period.


What the other guy said. I repeat, I’m not actually calling you a shill. I even agree with your point about JF, I’m just pointing out your logic is faulty.


That’s based on the assumption that’s your only account, though. Not that I’m calling you a shill, just pointing out the obvious flaw in your logic. Any actual shill would have sockpuppets to spread out their comments and hide their history.


And, are you an agnostic or an nonbeliever? Cause he can’t be both.
Oh great, I ended up arguing with somebody who isn’t even familiar with the meaning of the term.
Agnostic: one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god.
Good bot