That’s really cool I didn’t know that was an option already. How does Ubuntu and windows compare for operating system support if I have a problem with the laptop? Is the manufacturer liable for the smooth running of the operating system? Or is the owner of the operating system liable?
So if you did open a computer shop and are selling this plethora of Linux options, doesn’t that leave you liable if there are issues with the operating system?
If I buy a laptop and my windows is running poorly don’t I have windows support taking care of my windows problems?
If I buy a laptop from you with mint installed and am having problems I can’t contact Linux for support, I’ll have to contact you the shop owner.
Won’t this liability discourage shop owners from selling laptops/desktops with Linux?
Call me naive, I know I am. But how can Linux be a moderated product to sell for desktop? I know phones run Linux, and many other products like streaming pucks run Linux (or is called unix?), but what would it take for an operating linux system to be centralized into a package to toss into a lenova laptop you’re staring at in best buy?
That’s awesome. Thank you. I’ll try it.
Will this effect callers who’s numbers I don’t have that I need to take? I have business calls all the time where I don’t know the number.
Am I the only one that uses lightning launcher? I think I should switch.
Its not a participation award game. It’s the game of games. It’s not about kelce not getting to play. It’s about the chiefs losing because they’re not utilizing their best weapon. It’s a team sport and you’re watching your team lose because you’re not being used.
Imagine being on a competitive team project and you’re the best speaker presenting to the state but your teacher decides to let the shy kids try to present, clearly bumbling and being incoherent, letting your opponents out argue every point your peers are making when you clearly can out speak them. You’d be pretty upset with your teacher for getting you to states, you being the reason you’re there, and then once you’re there you’re sidelined.
Wow. That would make me rage so hard. But I have had galaxy phones since the 6, on 21 ultra now. I’ve never seen an ad there.
So the pokemon mod for minecraft can be sued and taken down?
Yeah you can’t make money off of copyrighted intellectual property without seeing some lawyers.
As long as the mods are free (can’t monetize on IP) most mods should be legally safe from copyright. But I’m not a lawyer so not sure how this works.
I’ve had this issue with my headset forever, sometimes it works sometimes it doesn’t but I would ask Google a question and then Google replies with you “please unlock your device”. If I unlock my device with my hands I’m not asking you how many grams of protein are in a cup of flour. My hands are dirty. Or busy. If this update makes it no longer accept requests while locked and I’m wearing my Bluetooth headset, the wtf is the point of it.
Yeah… I’ve also never watched star trek, or used Linux, or had Firefox and browsing is all that.
How does libretube compare with revanced?
Scratch towers and training. I used a small tower and a larger one (amazing reviews), combined with not letting them on kitchen chairs/tables/countertops using aluminum foil, repellent spray, and just discipline. But this is from kitten. My 2 cats never went on countertops even during the night when people said “wait till you leave”. I have cameras. I left food on countertops and they wouldn’t touch it. Including cat food once. They didn’t scratch our couches. But the girl did end up destroying under the couch because she found a way into it. That’s more me failing to provide a hidden safe space for her.
No it’s not. Renting is a totally normal way to have a place to live without having to deal with banks and the mess that getting a mortgage or a loan causes. Some people prefer to rent because they just pay for the home and live there. Don’t have to worry about the rest that comes with home ownership and leave it to the owner.
Renting as a business or corporation should absolutely be outlawed. Apartments should be owned by the tenants. Condos and HOA’s should be owned by the community they serve.
A man owning a home and renting it out isn’t the problem and you know it.
I agree. They should make it that no one person can own more than like 3 properties or something like that.
Apartments should be owned by the renters. They pay for their management and if it’s poorly managed they can choose to hire someone else.
Same with condos and the absolute nightmare costs of HOA. No HOA should own a community. The community should own the HOA.
Is it because Microsoft is the big dog with money and Linux is no dog because there is no company backing Linux? Windows sells solely because Windows can push the product?
Would it be benificial (albeit this will be extremely frowned upon by this community I believe) for a Linux distro to be backed and monetized via a corporation with a legal team to help push a Linux product on the shelves? In the short run it’s a bad idea, but in the long run it’ll familiarize the public, and push software developers for compatability. The incentive being that there’s money now involved and it won’t be a project for people.
Because right now to use Linux for the majority of user case operations you’d need at least computer science 101 to start installing a distro, partitions, manual software installation, to get running. Or am I wrong on this part?