• tararity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yknow this whole exhausting discussion could be avoided by simply not using Ai tho, not because of any moral reasoning but because the fact we are even arguing about this is taking away from the point being made. Rather than get mad at how people react to Ai, just consider if even using Ai is worth the inevitable derailment it’s causes.

    • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or, yknow don’t assume the worst of people? You haven’t lived in their shoes and don’t know their experience. Do the thing taht actually makes us human, communicate

      • tararity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This comment does not follow from anything I said. It’s mostly just confusing that you are reacting this way

      • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nope, no assumptions are necessary to notice someone spreading AI slop and determine that at best they’re misguided and at worst they’re using the planet-destroying plagiarism machine on purpose to influence people.

        If you think a message is important, but not important enough to actually spend time and effort on spreading the message, you never really thought the message was important, you just wanted the validation people give you for spreading the message.

        • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sorry, agree to disagree. Also again you’re teh oneakjng assuntions. This is my last response to this thread Have a great day and weekend