sanitation@lemmy.today to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoOne of the lowercase m is actually an r + n, and the other isn't.lemmy.todayimagemessage-square116linkfedilinkarrow-up1815arrow-down16
arrow-up1809arrow-down1imageOne of the lowercase m is actually an r + n, and the other isn't.lemmy.todaysanitation@lemmy.today to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square116linkfedilink
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·2 months agoZooming in, they look absolutely identical to me.
minus-squareNeatNit@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·2 months agoThe first one looks ever so sightly wider to me, but their shape is exactly the same otherwise and it would be impossible to notice if no one told me
minus-squareHideakikarate@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 months agoI feel like the first one being “rn” just because that first hump looks ever so slightly more bold than the entirety of the second “m”.
minus-squareraef@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agothe “arm” on the r is a little straighter
Zooming in, they look absolutely identical to me.
The first one looks ever so sightly wider to me, but their shape is exactly the same otherwise and it would be impossible to notice if no one told me
I feel like the first one being “rn” just because that first hump looks ever so slightly more bold than the entirety of the second “m”.
the “arm” on the r is a little straighter