androidtate@lemdro.id to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 1 year agoLouis Rossman: The best way to watch online video; my yearlong project is finally done!youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1345arrow-down131file-text
arrow-up1314arrow-down1external-linkLouis Rossman: The best way to watch online video; my yearlong project is finally done!youtube.comandroidtate@lemdro.id to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square89fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down7·1 year agoTechnically open source in what definition? Not by Open Source Initiative definition (https://opensource.org/osd/), not in Wikipedia’s definition (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source)… Public code on GitLab does not mean open source in the same way public video on YouTube does not mean Creative Commons.
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·edit-211 months ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
minus-squareHughJanus@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year ago Technically open source in what definition? By the literal definition of source code that is open.
minus-squaresmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoBut what it mean to be open? Have you heard of “open” culture or “open” standard that is free to use unless we don’t allow you to?
Technically open source in what definition? Not by Open Source Initiative definition (https://opensource.org/osd/), not in Wikipedia’s definition (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source)…
Public code on GitLab does not mean open source in the same way public video on YouTube does not mean Creative Commons.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
By the literal definition of source code that is open.
But what it mean to be open?
Have you heard of “open” culture or “open” standard that is free to use unless we don’t allow you to?