• JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    If communism becomes authoritarian every time it is attempted, I don’t see the practical distinction.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Meanwhile, capitalism not only reliably devolves into dictatorships of the wealthy, but also dictatorships of whichever caste or ethnic group manages to rise to political dominance.

      Or do you think the consistent and aggressive disenfranchisement of people of colour is just democracy in action or something?

      • JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Classifying democracies as dictatorships is histrionic in the extreme, and specious at best. It doesn’t even make sense. The concepts are antithetical.

        • TheDankHold@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not classifying all democracies as democracy and capitalism aren’t a bonded pair. When dollars are votes, the system will be democracy amongst the wealthy as they have more votes with their greater number of dollars. Those without capital will inherently have their voices heard less.

          Thus it is a system that claims democracy but only the oligarchs truly get their voices heard. This leads to a type of dictatorship of the wealthy. If it was a true democracy then why are so many policies popular among the lower classes getting ignored in favor of tax loopholes for corporations? Why did billions of PPP get given out to businesses and forgiven with no fuss but ~2k for struggling families saw intense opposition and weak support?

          • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oligarchs aren’t necessarily rich, they just achieved power in some fashion. Plutarchs achieved power through wealth. It’s the main difference between plutocracy and oligarchy. While oligarchy and oligarchs aren’t technically incorrect, they are less accurate. Especially if you’re trying to drive the point of wealth as being the source of power. Not criticizing, just letting you know there’s a faster route to saying what you want to say.

    • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cool? Your ignorance is your problem mate, if you want to continue to be wrong in leiu of the vast body of information available at your fingertips be my guest.