• Ghost@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    https://github.com/arindas/manjarno

    https://www.hadet.dev/Manjaro-Bad/

    Manjaro also has a “rolling release” model that isn’t actually fully rolling release. They hold back packages for a few weeks which in return has almost always destroyed the AUR for not only manjaro users but Arch users.

    They lie about it being fully rolling. Not just that they have forgotten to sign their signature keys multiple times before releasing big updates.

    Sure it’s an easier Arch for “beginners” but I’d say it’s easier to just install arch on a VM if you really want to learn and use arch that bad a VM is the best way.

    Pure Arch is better than Manjaro. Hell I hate Ubuntu but I’d rather use that over Manjaro

    • Acid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know that’s not a Manjaro problem that’s a user problem, you’re specifically warned that AUR compatibility is not guaranteed with Manjaro https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository

      But people often ignore this and then complain that Manjaro isn’t stable.

      And yes Manjaro is fully rolling just because they delay packages a week doesn’t stop it being rolling, that’s like calling tumbleweed not a rolling release?

      I’m not arguing that Manjaro is better or worse than Arch just that if you use it as intended it functions correctly and is a good way to learn Linux and Arch.