Some mix of wrong and right, the exact proportions of which I’ll leave as an exercise to the reader.

  • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stable is freaking old and unstable.

    I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.

    • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of people (incorrectly) equate “stable” with “bug-free”. So conversely, having bugs would be “unstable”.

    • Sir Aramis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure the whole statement is

      Stable is freaking old, and unstable has lots of limitations

      I don’t think they’re saying Debian LTS is unstable.

      • warmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.