• RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3·
    9 months ago

    Of all the rrats this one seems to be the most believable, but at the end of the day its still all entirely speculation and unconfirmed conjecture. Until definitive proof comes out, if it ever does, it’s best to simply leave these as just speculation and not to believe them too much.

    While I certainly don’t see a situation where Doki is somehow wrong or lying, there is a non-zero chance I and others are just being misled. I think its pretty close to zero, but its still non-zero. No real evidence other than statement of character and implication has been shown (very smart legal counsel, BTW), so it’s better to hold off on coming to a conclusion too quickly, especially since none of us are even a party to the complaints.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      9 months ago

      The easiest way I saw it explained was that “rrat” is shortened from “narrative.” So a rrat is just a story or way of explaining certain events that has little to no evidence proving what is stated. Purely speculation. However, its important to note that many people who are against something will falsify evidence to present a rrat (narrative) that is slanderous or outright false because they are against that thing.

    • Hal-5700X@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      11·
      9 months ago

      The duck is a rrat?

      rrat is any crazy theory or headcanon related to Vtuber culture.

      EDIT Also it can mean “schizo”. Based on the context.