• SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They compared the $130 TB4 Apple cable to $5 junk cables, but I wish they included some $40-80 competitors in the comparison. How does Anker fare?

        • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          To me it is, could just be the guy who wrote it really likes Apple though. Who actually thought the 3 dollar cables were the same as the 140 dollar cable?

          • Bonehead@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If he really likes Apple products because they are supposedly superior, why not show that by comparing them to actual Apple competitor products instead of dollar store stuff?

          • Established_Trial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know a shocking number of people who think they’re just as good, and they can’t be convinced otherwise!

            • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              I generally never believe a product is worth what apple is charging.

              However, I also expect that the spin and salesmanship required to sell a five dollar cable as a 140 dollar cable is beyond even what Apple is willing to do. So I agree 100% it would have been much more interesting to see it compared against say a 40-80 dollar cable.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but honestly, it’s only the very worst cable that the Apple one truly looks good in comparison to. For the other ones, it’s better, yeah. Sure. 5-10 bucks better. Not 110+ better.

    • bulwark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anecdotally, I personally love Anker stuff and exclusively buy cables and chargers from them.

    • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a USB-C cable that was around the $40 mark, and it has bulky and robust connectors that likely house some electronics in them. I originally bought it to my mom as a charger/data cable, but she didn’t like it, so I use it to occasionally connect my phone to my monitor. It transfers USB and 2.5K video signal without an issue with superfast charging as a bonus, and also braided. Not sure if it would fare at TB4 speeds.

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kind of curious about the Cablematters TB4 cable also as it seems to be of comparable quality to the Apple cable.

  • Doctor xNo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    …this cable accumulated 29 one-star reviews on Amazon and was discontinued the day after we bought it.

    “Yes! Somebody real bought it! Quickly pull everything before they sue us.” 😅

  • ayyndrew@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anyone know of a decently priced, fully featured USB C cable that I can just buy a bunch of? I have to keep track of which high speed data cable came with my external SSD, which cable is USB 2.0 only, and which cables support high speed charging which kind of defeats the “one cable to rule them all” point of USB C

    • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I make custom cables for the film industry. Some of the cables I make are ave $250 and they’re not even smart cables. Those UsB cables are not just a wire they’re a communication interface embedded in them.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I feel like cable type really doesn’t matter for me since USB-C is mostly gonna be used to charge, and data transfer is something I hand off to WiFi or Bluetooth. That said, I don’t buy cheap ass cables for a reason. But I also don’t spend a small fortune either.

    This article feels like an ad for Apple cables, Amazon Basics cables, and an expensive ass CT scanner I’ll never need and hope to god they’re giving those employees dosimeters.

  • pacjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nice read!

    I especially liked the part with the wiggly trace for better signal integrity. Always good to see design theory in practice.

  • Chestrade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought the thumbnail was an illustrations of some minecraft skins for a second.

    • ijeff@lemdro.idOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      More about showing off neat CT scans. I wouldn’t read too much into it given the sample of cables looked at. I personally had no idea industrial CT scanning was a thing!